Thanks, Xavier! I will do that.
Xavier Montagutelli wrote:
On Monday 04 September 2006 04:43, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
The new CentOS 4.4 that was released in the last few days includes a
version of rpm that results in the error message "error: can't create
transacti
The new CentOS 4.4 that was released in the last few days includes a
version of rpm that results in the error message "error: can't create
transaction lock on /vservers/test/var/lock/rpm/transaction" when trying
to build vserver "test", and no rpms are actually installed into the
vserver.
Fal
On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 08:51:58PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
In it's own thread now -- sorry for the unintentional hijack.
I have two practically identical vserver hosts, named vhost1 and vhost3.
They are both running kernel CentOS (2.6.14.3-vs2.0.1-rc5) x86_64.
/etc/hosts
In it's own thread now -- sorry for the unintentional hijack.
I have two practically identical vserver hosts, named vhost1 and
vhost3.
They are both running kernel CentOS (2.6.14.3-vs2.0.1-rc5) x86_64.
/etc/hosts on each one is essentially the same, and the routes look
good and essentially
Sorry about the previous thread hijacks --- I didn't realize what the
list server was using to do the threading.
I have been working on getting the freenx remote X access aplication
working on a vserver host machine.
When using the v_sshd wrapper, it fails, fairly late in the process of a
logi
I have two practically identical vserver hosts, named vhost1 and vhost3.
They are both running kernel CentOS (2.6.14.3-vs2.0.1-rc5) x86_64.
/etc/hosts on each one is essentially the same, and the routes look good
and essentially the same.
The ifconfig output for both looks the same, and both
I have been working on getting the freenx remote X access aplication
working on a vserver host machine.
When using the v_sshd wrapper, it fails, fairly late in the process of a
login.
If I do not use the wrapper, and start sshd from the standard initscript
with the following lines in sshd_co
Herbert,
I'm trying to install the most up-todate versions of things before
hauling some servers out to a datacenter (must leave my basement --- OH
NO! ) and have run into the following problem.
vserver-stat fails, returning:
vc_create_context(): Invalid argument
but my two vservers do sta
Herbert,
Where do I find the test? I'll run it for x86_64 for you. I'm
currently at 2.6.11.7-vs2.0-pre3. I'll run it and then upgrade and run
again.
Paul
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
Linux-VServer Test [V0.12] (C) 2003-2005 H.Poetzl
chcontext is working.
chbind is working.
Linux 2.6.11.8-vs2.0-pre4
understand that vhashify will work on files that are not part of
any package, but I assume that there must be a "cost" or downside to
using the extra capability.
Regards,
Paul (and thanks again!)
Enrico Scholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Paul S. Gumerman") writes:
related.
Best regards,
Paul
Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
Setting releasever="4" in yum.conf in the
/usr/lib/util-vserver/distributions/centos4/yum directory didn't help,
either.
Any ideas?
Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
Yes, but *which* configuration files? I do not find it anywhere.
Setting releasever="4" in yum.conf in the
/usr/lib/util-vserver/distributions/centos4/yum directory didn't help,
either.
Any ideas?
Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
Yes, but *which* configuration files? I do not find it anywhere.
If I cheat, and replace the "$releasever" string
Yes, but *which* configuration files? I do not find it anywhere.
If I cheat, and replace the "$releasever" strings in the repository info
with "4", it gets farther, but complains about not finding the proper
strings later in the process.
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
Pa
That's part of what vserver create should be installing, but it can't
run properly.
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
I'm following (and correcting where I can) the CentOS distribution
howto here: http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo
this is on a dual Opt
I'm following (and correcting where I can) the CentOS distribution howto
here: http://linux-vserver.org/CentOS_HowTo
this is on a dual Opteron box, using the x86_64 arch, and I'm having a
problem with yum.
It seems that the $releasever variable is not being set to "4" or "4.0",
and so when yu
I hope this isn't considered to be an idiotic question, but here goes:
What's the minimal way to configure a vserver (using FC3 for both host
and guest) to be able to send OUTGOING email via the sendmail service
that is already running on the host
I've got cron jobs running in a vserver tha
Michal,
You might try recompiling the tools without dietlib. That's what I had
to do to make things work in x86_64.
Until you do that, or use the patch that Herbert supplied, you will
have problems.
Paul
Michal Ludvig wrote:
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
- the tools (util-vserver 0.
Herbert --- a small typo here:
with glibc, every v* command which executes something
fails with execv*: permission denied
That should read:
with dietlibc, every v* command which executes something
fails with execv*: permission denied
glibc seems to work fine. BTW what are the "Known issues"
Plus RH now
has selinux security "enhancements" these will not be compatible with a
plain vanilla kernel like vserver.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul S.
Gumerman
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 10:41 PM
To: vserver@list.linux-vser
My thoughts exactly! I'll be doing a test install today, then patching
a kernel for drbd + linux-vserver.
Daniel S. Reichenbach wrote:
Hi,
This may be somewhat off-topic, but why is it that people like centos
which seems to me like REL without support. Since support is what REL
Has anyone tried the CentOs 4.0 distribution with linux-vserver? It's a
repackage of RedHat Enterprise Linux 4.0. I'm currently using A
mish-mash of FC1, 2 & 3 and I'm considering a switch to CentOs. Two of
my servers are Opteron-based, so I'm particularly interested if you are
using the x86
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:44:07PM -0400, Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64, but it simply didn't work
(caused all kinds of problems with vserver).
I did not really understand this. I understand
dietlibc version 0.28 built fine on x86_64, but it simply didn't work
(caused all kinds of problems with vserver).
Paul
Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Hello
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 05:33:37PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 07:35:40AM +0200, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Herbert,
I'm sure there must be a very interesting story surrounding the "flower
page". Care to let us newbies in on the joke???
Paul
Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 03:18:14PM +0100, Gaz Wilson wrote:
Hi!
I have recently built a test server using Debian and have
ECTED] ("Paul S. Gumerman") writes:
I tried to start loco-reference, but got the message "an error
occurred very likely that initscript faild " with no other
details regarding just what had failed. When I started it again, I did
get the message that lines
Herbert ... hope you can help. Here's what's happened:
I've had 1.94-rc4 with kernel 2.6.11-rc3 running just fine on a dual
Opteron box under FC3-x86_64. I have two vservers that I startup on
reboot, and two more "reference" servers that were startable. These
are all FC3-x86_64 vservers.
T
Where can I find this? It doesn't appear to be available at the 13th
floor site ... the latest I see is 30.204.
Paul
Enrico Scholz wrote:
Hello,
version 0.30.205 util-vserver (alpha branch) is out. Noticable changes
are a new 'vhashify' command which is a successor of 'vunify'. It uses
s
Herbert ...
memory might be the issue here, after all it means less than 50MB
for each vserver, that might easily drag you into swapping which
very easily gets you into trashing ...
While "trashing" is not a bad description of the consequences, the
word is "thrashing" .
Paul
H
le way to manage the configuration data
that I don't know about.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
--Paul
Daniel Hokka Zakrisson wrote:
Paul S. Gumerman wrote:
As a new user I'm hesitant to barge in like this, but I feel strongly
on this issue. I have to say that the new configuration
As a new user I'm hesitant to barge in like this, but I feel strongly
on this issue. I have to say that the new configuration, with it's
staggering number of subdirectories, is TERRIBLE to use. I don't
understand what drove the decision to go this way ... there is an
enormous value in being
For what it's worth, when doing a "yum method" install of fc3 on an
x86_64 system with the new vserver code the creation of the vserver
would hang after the third group of rpms was installed. A yum process
was left running, but apparently blocked (top showed no additional CPU
usage).
I can't
Herbert,
I'd certainly be willing to kick in some $$, especially if I could get a
bit of targetted help here ...
As usual, I'm in a "need it right now" mode, and I'm deploying this
thing for development use even before I've got it 100% working.
The actual vservers seem to be running fantasticall
Mart,
Adaptive Server Enterprise/12.5.0.3/EBF 10980 ESD#1/P/Linux Intel/Linux
2.4.18-18.7.xsmp i686/rel12503/1919/32-bit/OPT/Mon Mar 24
20:49:12
is running just fine in an FC3 2.6.1
ques Gelinas wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:33:05 -0500, Paul S. Gumerman wrote
I'm at the point where I need some help.
The machine is a dual Opteron, with Fedora Core 3 installed. I've
downloaded a vanilla 2.6.11rc-3 kernel, and patched it with the latest
vs1.94-rc4 patch s
I'm at the point where I need some help.
The machine is a dual Opteron, with Fedora Core 3 installed. I've
downloaded a vanilla 2.6.11rc-3 kernel, and patched it with the latest
vs1.94-rc4 patch set, which applied and built cleanly. Then I built the
util-vserver packages from source, and insta
35 matches
Mail list logo
