On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 23:09 +0100, Martin wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:21 +0200, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > I'm working on a project to checkpoint and restart processes. Obviously,
> > after a
> > process dies, and is "transparently" restarted, it might get confused
> > because
> > its pid chan
On Mon, 2005-10-24 at 18:21 +0200, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I'm working on a project to checkpoint and restart processes. Obviously,
> after a
> process dies, and is "transparently" restarted, it might get confused because
> its pid changed. (This is one of many issues, but I'm starting with pids)
I
On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 06:21:26PM +0200, Dave Hansen wrote:
> I'm working on a project to checkpoint and restart processes. Obviously,
> after a
> process dies, and is "transparently" restarted, it might get confused because
> its pid changed. (This is one of many issues, but I'm starting with
I'm working on a project to checkpoint and restart processes. Obviously, after
a
process dies, and is "transparently" restarted, it might get confused because
its pid changed. (This is one of many issues, but I'm starting with pids)
I don't want to change the kernel's internal idea of pids, but
