On Friday 27 August 2004 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load
> production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into
> 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results.
>
> -Josh
Great to know that rc2 has got som
I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load
production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into
2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results.
-Josh
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:03, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian
On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2.
> I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup:
>
> Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
> (Debian 1:
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:48:12AM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2.
> I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup:
>
> Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
Hi,
I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2.
I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup:
Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4
(Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004
processor : 0
ve