Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-))

2004-08-27 Thread Christian Mayrhuber
On Friday 27 August 2004 18:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load > production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into > 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results. > > -Josh Great to know that rc2 has got som

Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-))

2004-08-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have it compiled and waiting. I will be rebooting 3 high-load production machines from 2.4.23-vs1.22 and 2.4.25-vs1.26 into 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2. I will be sure to let you know of my results. -Josh On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 09:03, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian

Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-))

2004-08-27 Thread Christian Mayrhuber
On Friday 20 August 2004 11:48, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2. > I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup: > > Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 > (Debian 1:

Re: [Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-)

2004-08-20 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 11:48:12AM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2. > I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup: > > Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4

[Vserver] 2.4.27-vs1.29-rc2 :-)

2004-08-20 Thread Christian Mayrhuber
Hi, I haven't heard anything on the stability of vs1.29-rc2. I will let you know that vs1.29-rc2 is doing well with the following setup: Linux version 2.4.27-686-smp-vs1.29-rc2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 11 20:28:34 CEST 2004 processor : 0 ve