On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 09:25:51PM +0200, Bodo Eggert wrote:
On Sat, 28 May 2005, gary ng wrote:
I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready for
2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.
Hi,
I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready for
2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.
Without it, I cannot mount within vserver but I see
mount as a legitimate use like mounting CIFS/NFS or
FUSE
On Sat, 28 May 2005, gary ng wrote:
I am testing out vserver(1.2.10 on 2.4, not ready for
2.6 yet because of stability issue unrelated to
vserver) and I am wondering what is the impact of
giving CAP_SYS_ADMIN to it.
Without it, I cannot mount within vserver but I see
mount as a legitimate
Thanks. The reason I said it is legitimate use is that
I saw people offer vserver based VDS solutions. After
a closer examine, I think vserver is more suitable for
host service only jail rather than a full featured
VDS(I had one before which use uml), so mainly for
internal server
