Pardon for the resend of this crosspost, but I sent it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----Original Message----- From: Marc E. Fiuczynski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 5:29 PM To: Shailabh Nagar; Sam Vilain; ckrm-tech; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [ckrm-tech] CKRM with VServers Pardon for the widespread crosspost. Hubertus has given me a patch and I did the little bit required to have vserver 1.9.1 use RBCE. For those interested in a kernel that combines CKRM w/ VSERVER, we can open up our CVS repository for anonymous access. Please contact me if you'd like our snapshot rather than patching these two things together manually yourself. Cheers, Marc -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Shailabh Nagar Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2004 9:40 PM To: Sam Vilain Cc: ckrm-tech; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ckrm-tech] CKRM with VServers Sam Vilain wrote: > Shailabh Nagar wrote: > >> - The SELinux folks are interested in creating classes based on the >> security context of a task and then limiting the resources of the >> task based on it. > > > > You could pretty much s/SELinux/Linux VServer/ that comment and it would > still be valid :-). > > The classification engine for a Linux-VServer.net kernel would be a > piece of cake, alright. Is there a dummy/skeleton resource classifier > that I could use as a base? RBCE, while not a skeleton classifier, should be good enough for your case. Its integrated into the CKRM patch (available from the main web page). Hubertus already has a patch for adding support within RBCE for defining rules using Vserver's xids. We'll add it to our next RBCE update. > >> - Jamal Hadi is interested in investigating the use of CKRM along with >> vservers to make virtual routers. His requirements, broadly speaking, >> are : accurate accounting of irqs for routed packets, ability to >> launch 500-1000 vservers and have them performance isolated from each >> other. Vivek spoke to Jamal in detail and can list the requirements >> better. On the whole, it looks like his needs are very similar to that >> of PlanetLab (one privileged domain used to create others), fault >> isolation would be nice but not essential etc. > > > > Oh, dear - how many different meanings of the word "vserver" are there? > To compound matters, one project is pretty much the logical inverse of > the other ;-). I'm pretty sure he meant Linux-VServer (multiple contexts on one OS image) - not clustering ! -- Shailabh ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=4721&alloc_id=10040&op=click _______________________________________________ ckrm-tech mailing list https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ckrm-tech _______________________________________________ Vserver mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
