Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-04-03 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 03:44:40PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: Hello Herbert, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: [snip] That said do you remember how much 'new' is this option (I don't have enough space to save all kernel and config

Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-04-01 Thread Joel Soete
Hello Herbert, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: [snip] That said do you remember how much 'new' is this option (I don't have enough space to save all kernel and config ;( )? Well some time ago (I find back: around 2.6.12-rc1), I already did

Re:[Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-03-31 Thread Joel Soete
Hello Herbert, On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:23:27PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: [...] Unfortunately, it's not actualy usable because exhibit to much BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! which dramaticaly reduce the few perf of this box ;-(. It _seems_ to be a parisc kernel pb but not easy to

Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-03-31 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: Hello Herbert, On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:23:27PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: [...] Unfortunately, it's not actualy usable because exhibit to much BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! which dramaticaly reduce the few perf of

[Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-03-30 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:23:27PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: Hello all, given the pb I encountered with ext3 (severall corruption at different places) with development vs release (2.1...) with this parisc kernel, I try to implement the stable one (2.0.2). Here are the results of test: