[Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-03-30 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:23:27PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > Hello all, > > given the pb I encountered with ext3 (severall corruption at different places) > with development vs release (2.1...) with this parisc kernel, I try to > implement the stable one (2.0.2). > > Here are the results of test

Re:[Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-03-31 Thread Joel Soete
Hello Herbert, > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:23:27PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: [...] > > > > Unfortunately, it's not actualy usable because exhibit to much "BUG: soft > > lockup detected on CPU#0!" which dramaticaly reduce the few perf of this box ;-(. > > > > It _seems_ to be a parisc kernel pb but

Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-03-31 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > Hello Herbert, > > > On Thu, Mar 30, 2006 at 06:23:27PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > [...] > > > > > > Unfortunately, it's not actualy usable because exhibit to much "BUG: soft > > > lockup detected on CPU#0!" which dramaticaly reduce the

Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-04-01 Thread Joel Soete
Hello Herbert, Herbert Poetzl wrote: On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: [snip] That said do you remember how much 'new' is this option (I don't have enough space to save all kernel and config ;<( )? Well some time ago (I find back: around 2.6.12-rc1), I already did

Re: [Vserver] Re: [parisc 32bit] first test of 'stable' vs 2.6.16-vs2.0.2-rc14 (-pa10 parisc tree)

2006-04-03 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 03:44:40PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > > Hello Herbert, > > > > > > Herbert Poetzl wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 06:27:51PM +0100, Joel Soete wrote: > > > > > [snip] > > >>That said do you remember how much 'new' is this option (I don't have > > >>enough space to save