Re: [Vserver] Re: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-06-06 Thread Benedikt Boehm
On Monday 06 June 2005 17:33, Martin Honermeyer wrote: > Am Montag 06 Juni 2005 16:56 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: > > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:58:07PM +0200, Martin Honermeyer wrote: > > > Thanks Herbert! > > > > > > I am using the 1.9.5 developer patches. I've just looked at the table > > > in the "

Re: [Vserver] Re: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-06-06 Thread Martin Honermeyer
Am Montag 06 Juni 2005 16:56 schrieb Herbert Poetzl: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:58:07PM +0200, Martin Honermeyer wrote: > > Thanks Herbert! > > > > I am using the 1.9.5 developer patches. I've just looked at the table in > > the "Release FAQ". Am I right I have to upgrade my kernel to 2.0RCx in >

Re: [Vserver] Re: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-06-06 Thread Herbert Poetzl
On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 03:58:07PM +0200, Martin Honermeyer wrote: > Thanks Herbert! > > I am using the 1.9.5 developer patches. I've just looked at the table in the > "Release FAQ". Am I right I have to upgrade my kernel to 2.0RCx in order to > have VROOT support? Is it already in implemented in

[Vserver] Re: Re: CAP_SYS_ADMIN, how unsecure it is within vserver

2005-06-06 Thread Martin Honermeyer
Thanks Herbert! I am using the 1.9.5 developer patches. I've just looked at the table in the "Release FAQ". Am I right I have to upgrade my kernel to 2.0RCx in order to have VROOT support? Is it already in implemented in RC3? Martin Herbert Poetzl wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2005 at 10:30:16AM +