At 18:04 on Sat 13/12/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] masquerading as 'Herbert Poetzl' wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:10:09PM +, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
Hi Jonathan!
I totally agree that uts_sem isn't the apropriate
to use in this place(s), but I don't see how this
could cause a
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:10:09PM +, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
Hi Jonathan!
I totally agree that uts_sem isn't the apropriate
to use in this place(s), but I don't see how this
could cause a deadlock/panic as there is nothing
to lock/panic if the rw sem is held for write ...
On Fri, Dec 12, 2003 at 08:10:09PM +, Jonathan Sambrook wrote:
[ incredibly important info zapped here ]
I totally agree that uts_sem isn't the apropriate
to use in this place(s), but I don't see how this
could cause a deadlock/panic as there is nothing
to lock/panic if the rw sem is
