On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 11:24:18PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> OK, this isn't over yet :-)
>
> I just compiled and installed 2.6.8.1-vs1.9.3-rc2.1, with
> util-vserver-0.30.195 on a freshly installed FC1 machine.
>
> Created a vserver, created a config (using the new utils met
After some script reading, this tuns out to be documented:
name
When this file exists, the interface will be named
with the text in this file. Without such an entry,
the IP will not be shown by 'ifconfig' but by 'ip
OK, this isn't over yet :-)
I just compiled and installed 2.6.8.1-vs1.9.3-rc2.1, with
util-vserver-0.30.195 on a freshly installed FC1 machine.
Created a vserver, created a config (using the new utils method) when i
start it (with or without hide_netif in the flags file), the interface is
NOT c
Strange... after a reboot it behaves differently - pretty much gives me
what I need - hide the IP of eth0, but show the vserver IP. Before it
would hide all interfaces sompletely. Not sure what happened there...
Grisha
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, H
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
In vs 1.9.3 I noticed that ifconfig from within a vserver shows the inet
addr of eth0 and lo (in 1.2x it did not) - is this the way it's supposed
to be, or am I missing a configur
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 04:28:03PM -0400, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> In vs 1.9.3 I noticed that ifconfig from within a vserver shows the inet
> addr of eth0 and lo (in 1.2x it did not) - is this the way it's supposed
> to be, or am I missing a configuration option of some kind?
yes!
In vs 1.9.3 I noticed that ifconfig from within a vserver shows the inet
addr of eth0 and lo (in 1.2x it did not) - is this the way it's supposed
to be, or am I missing a configuration option of some kind?
Thanks!
Grisha
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL
