[Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-29 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
Has anyone applied the IPTables POM patches from the extras repository at netfilter.org? I just started looking into it and like a couple of the modules. Not sure if they will work/function/work-with(in) a vserver especially TARPIT and those that could be used for honey-potting. Thoughts? TIA

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-29 Thread Liam Helmer
Works no problem. You can use my patchset if you're running 2.4.25: http://strongboxlinux.com/files/linux-2.4.25sbl1/ vserver+POM+supermount+evfs+freeswan+a few other things Cheers, Liam On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 17:58, Roderick A. Anderson wrote: > Has anyone applied the IPTables POM patches from

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-29 Thread Roderick A. Anderson
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004, Liam Helmer wrote: > Works no problem. You can use my patchset if you're running 2.4.25: Thanks Liam. > http://strongboxlinux.com/files/linux-2.4.25sbl1/ > > vserver+POM+supermount+evfs+freeswan+a few other things Wow. Super patchset! For those of us slightly Linux chall

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-30 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> > http://strongboxlinux.com/files/linux-2.4.25sbl1/ > > > > vserver+POM+supermount+evfs+freeswan+a few other things > > Wow. Super patchset! For those of us slightly Linux challenged will a yup, and broken systrace on top. Very clever. > google search for supermount, evfs, and freeswan help

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-30 Thread Liam Helmer
On Tue, 2004-03-30 at 09:51, Dariush Pietrzak wrote: > > > http://strongboxlinux.com/files/linux-2.4.25sbl1/ > > > > > > vserver+POM+supermount+evfs+freeswan+a few other things > > > > Wow. Super patchset! For those of us slightly Linux challenged will a > yup, and broken systrace on top. Very

Re: [Vserver] iptables POM extras repository

2004-03-31 Thread Dariush Pietrzak
> > > google search for supermount, evfs, and freeswan help explain what and > > I wouldn't recommend freeswan for 2.4.25, it's not trivial to merge, and > > there already is openswan project that's in active development. > > This is for compatibility with some older systems. Not trivial to merg