On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:22:10PM -0600, Matthew Nuzum wrote:
> > >
> > > I do think that this would be an interesting feature.
> >
> > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/
> > (seems to have updated patches regarding this stuff)
> > http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/token-limiter
> >
> > I do think that this would be an interesting feature.
>
> http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/
> (seems to have updated patches regarding this stuff)
> http://www.theshore.net/~caker/uml/patches/token-limiter.README
>
> will look into it .. anybody volunteering to test
> such stuff
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:06:46PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> There is something like this in a patch to UML developed by the Linode
> folks:
>
> http://www.linode.com/forums/archive/o_t/t_790/linode.com_status_update_04_06_04.html
>
> Looks like a token bucket, only for IO.
There is something like this in a patch to UML developed by the Linode
folks:
http://www.linode.com/forums/archive/o_t/t_790/linode.com_status_update_04_06_04.html
Looks like a token bucket, only for IO.
It may be easier to do something like this in UML because their IO driver
is a constant (UBD
On Thu, 31 Mar 2005, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hmm, so you would like to artificially slow down the
> I/O transfer of a vserver, and make the transaction
> somewhat longer than necessary?
I guess more like not slowing down the hos
> >
> >would it be possilble to limit write/read speed for single vservers
> to
> >split
> >
> >the speed of the disc? For vservers with many copy,gzip or in
> special
> >backup jobs it would be quite usefull.
>
> hmm, so you would like to artificially slow down the
> I/O transfe
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:26:31AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Thank you for your fast answers.
>
>I/O Limit for virtual machines. E.g. when you do a gzip job in a
>virtual machine, the I/O Load and cpu Load will
>
>be quite high. To limit the cpu load is implemented
