mandag 29. dec 2003 kl. 02:07 skrev Herbert Poetzl:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:53:54PM +0100, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
søndag 28. dec 2003 kl. 20:45 skrev Dariush Pietrzak:
is a ssh login good enough? or do you need physical access ?
it would be nice to have ability to run various kernels on it, that
then how about setting up a donation page for some corporate sponsors
to donate some SMP-capable hardware for me?
Dual ppc would be nice, thank you very much.
is an old dual p200mmx usefull ?
Of course.
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
Namagumi
søndag 28. dec 2003 kl. 19:00 skrev Dariush Pietrzak:
then how about setting up a donation page for some corporate sponsors
to donate some SMP-capable hardware for me?
Dual ppc would be nice, thank you very much.
is an old dual p200mmx usefull ?
Of course.
is a ssh login good enough? or do you
is a ssh login good enough? or do you need physical access ?
it would be nice to have ability to run various kernels on it, that means
that someone would have to have physical access to it if it wouldn't got up
after reboot. Also some arrangement for reading printk messages and oops
messages
søndag 28. dec 2003 kl. 20:45 skrev Dariush Pietrzak:
is a ssh login good enough? or do you need physical access ?
it would be nice to have ability to run various kernels on it, that
means
that someone would have to have physical access to it if it wouldn't
got up
after reboot. Also some
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:53:54PM +0100, Jon Bendtsen wrote:
søndag 28. dec 2003 kl. 20:45 skrev Dariush Pietrzak:
is a ssh login good enough? or do you need physical access ?
it would be nice to have ability to run various kernels on it, that
means
that someone would have to have
hmm, I hope you followed the vserver bug fixes,
and adapted them for ctx17, otherwise I cannot
consider ctx17 very stable ...
which bugfixes? I'm not aware of showstopper-bugs in ctx17.
Oh, and sorry for the term 'stable', let's replace it with 'old',
that way we can avoid having to
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
hmm, I hope you followed the vserver bug fixes,
and adapted them for ctx17, otherwise I cannot
consider ctx17 very stable ...
which bugfixes? I'm not aware of showstopper-bugs in ctx17.
for UP it's mostly okay, on SMP
*snip*
Oh, and sorry for the term 'stable', let's replace it with
'old', that way we can avoid having to synchronize what
'stable' actually means.
patches for non-debian distros are where?
Does anyone else that has actually run Debian find this hilarious?
old == Debian
old != non-debian
for UP it's mostly okay, on SMP machines, there are some
critical races, which either lock the machine or crash it ...
Oh, then since noone else is interested in fixing old ctx
then how about setting up a donation page for some corporate sponsors
to donate some SMP-capable hardware for me?
Running Gentoo proudly since May '03
that's nothing.. how about:
Growing beard since 1995.
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
Subject: Re: [Vserver] Announce - Bastard Patchset (version 0.13d)
Running Gentoo proudly since May '03
that's nothing.. how about:
Growing beard since 1995.
--
Key fingerprint = 40D0 9FFB 9939 7320 8294 05E0 BCC7 02C4 75CC 50D9
___
Vserver
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 01:05:10AM +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
Hi,
I have been maintaining server kernel patchset for some time now...
I figure someone else could be interested in it, it should be available
from http://eyck.forumakad.pl/Projects/bsd/, latest version is 13d, later
this
13 matches
Mail list logo
