Am Montag, 10. November 2003 16:54 schrieb Lyn St George:
> On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
> >> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
> >
> > Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
> >I've been trying to get rid of uw-i
-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Matthew Nuzum
> Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:30 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
>
> I have cyrus imapd running in a vserver without issue. I fol
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 11:58:59 -0500 (EST), Cathy Sarisky wrote:
>I'm using Courier for IMAP within a vserver with no problems. (Check the
>config file, tho, I think I had to specify the IP somewhere -- not in
>front of that install right now, but if you need the info, let me know
>and I'll find
://www.followers.net/isp
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Lyn St George
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>
I'm using Courier for IMAP within a vserver with no problems. (Check the
config file, tho, I think I had to specify the IP somewhere -- not in
front of that install right now, but if you need the info, let me know
and I'll find it.)
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Lyn St George wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Nov
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 08:53:03 +0100, Dariush Pietrzak wrote:
>> I now tried another imap daemon and it is pretty better and faster.
> Could please share a secret as to what another imap daemon?
>I've been trying to get rid of uw-imapd for years..
>
Has anyone had experience of Cyrus-imap ? I find
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 11:35 AM
Subject: Re: OT: Re: [Vserver] Vserver + OpenMosix...
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:17PM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
>
> [cut]
>
> > Re: CHPOSX thing, it looks pretty cool. But I fail to see how it would
b
On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 07:06:17PM +1100, Charles Dale wrote:
[cut]
> Re: CHPOSX thing, it looks pretty cool. But I fail to see how it would be
> particularly useful for a vserver running typical hosting tasks such as web
> server & mail. Is Apache going to be very happy to be knocked out, find
Well Dovecot is quite nice (dovecot.something.fi, hmm you better ask Googs). BUT
don't try it with mbox mailboxes. I got some pretty bad borkage. I also
couldn't understand how the chrooting worked - it failed for some of my users
but I couldn't work out why.
It's probably great if you run it with
