Hi,
Why do you even want to convert bytestrings to unicode?
Do you have some code / a example where those exceptions usually appear in the
current w3af code?
Regards,
Daniel
Am 15.02.2012 um 22:06 schrieb Javier Andalia:
> Hello Daniel,
>
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Zulla
> wro
Hello Daniel,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Zulla
wrote:
> What about switching over to Python3?
> It solves the UnicodeDecodeException madness.
Can you please be more specific? What exactly do you have in mind?
Maybe I'm wrong, but the way I see it w3af would still
receive/transmit e
What about switching over to Python3?
It solves the UnicodeDecodeException madness.
Cheers,
Daniel
Am 14.02.2012 um 12:24 schrieb Taras:
> There is one more thing to say about Unicode.
> Let's use decode(..., errors="ignore") for decoding strings into Unicode
> ones because without this option
Taras, Andres,,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 8:57 AM, Andres Riancho
wrote:
> Javier,
>
> How do the changes you commited yesterday affect the way we handle
> encodings? Do you agree with Taras' errors=ignore?
>
IMO, the right fix for this is to figure out what are the input
sources for the remain
Andres,
> What worries me is that you're only counting the number of URLs.
> Are we sure that all the filtered URLs were indeed variants of a
> previously found one AND that we already had X variants in the list
> and the filtered one was the X+1? Something else... which discovery
> plugins a
Taras,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> it is interesting thing that after I uncomment this code I got:
>
> Before filtering... 146
> After filtering... 37
>
> More then 50% of requests were filtered! And scan was faster!:)
Sure, scan will be much faster because w
Andres,
it is interesting thing that after I uncomment this code I got:
Before filtering... 146
After filtering... 37
More then 50% of requests were filtered! And scan was faster!:)
About proper place for filtering. Imho, there are 2 place (with option
like 'filterFuzzableRequests') for it:
1
Taras,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Taras wrote:
> Hi, all!
>
> There is code in w3afCore._realStart() [0] to filter such requests as:
> - http://host.tld/?id=3739286
> - http://host.tld/?id=3739285
>
> The question is why this code is commented out in the trunk?
According to [0] it l
Taras,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Taras wrote:
> Andres,
>
> it looks like roadmap page [0] is little bit out of date.
Yep, I've been a lazy project manager ;)
> When do we plan next w3af release and what issues it will include?
As you already know we don't have a strict schedule
Hi, all!
There is code in w3afCore._realStart() [0] to filter such requests as:
- http://host.tld/?id=3739286
- http://host.tld/?id=3739285
The question is why this code is commented out in the trunk?
[0]
http://w3af.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/w3af/trunk/core/controllers/w3afCore.py?view=ma
10 matches
Mail list logo
