Hey guys,
You may svn-checkout our last version.
The requested XSD file is plugins/output/xmlFile/report.xsd. Take a
look at it, play with it and if you have any question or suggestion
please let me know.
Thanks!
Javier Andalia
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Brad Causey wrote:
> I'm good wi
I'm good with XSD. :)
On 12/9/10, Adrien de Beaupre wrote:
>>
>> Javier is working on this as we speak, so please talk now or be silent
>> for ever :)
>>
>
>
> Either works for me!
>
> Cheers,
> Adrien
>
> --
> _
>
> Javier is working on this as we speak, so please talk now or be silent
> for ever :)
>
Either works for me!
Cheers,
Adrien
--
___
W3af-users mailing list
W3af-users@lists.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Javier Andalia wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I started working on the task originated by this thread [1].
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Brad Causey wrote:
>> Agree.
>>
>> DTD will offer the most flexibility, IMO.
>>
>> I'll work on a parser for the XML output.
>>
Hey guys,
I started working on the task originated by this thread [1].
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Brad Causey wrote:
> Agree.
>
> DTD will offer the most flexibility, IMO.
>
> I'll work on a parser for the XML output.
>
Brad, I think that, on the contrary, XSD is richer and more expressi
Adrien,
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Adrien de Beaupre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wrote a quick w3af XML output parser.
> If you could take a look and let me know what you think I would appreciate it.
> (Yes, it is written in Perl and uses XML::DOM)
> Had to make some assumptions on the structure of
Hi,
I wrote a quick w3af XML output parser.
If you could take a look and let me know what you think I would appreciate it.
(Yes, it is written in Perl and uses XML::DOM)
Had to make some assumptions on the structure of the XML, but will tweak
it when more documentation is available. Works for all
Agree.
DTD will offer the most flexibility, IMO.
I'll work on a parser for the XML output.
-Brad Causey
CISSP, MCSE, C|EH, CIFI, CGSP
http://www.owasp.org
--
"Si vis pacem, para bellum"
--
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 6:41 AM, Adrien de Beaupre wrote:
> Hi Andrés,
>
> I suppose what I really nee
Hi Andrés,
I suppose what I really need is a document describing how the XML
output is laid out.
Elements, attributes...
Makes it a wee bit easier to parse it!
:)
Otherwise I have to make too many assumptions, and we know that
assumption is the mother of truly major screw ups.
Cheers,
Adrien de
Brad, Adrien,
I'm exploring this enhancement right now and I see that there are
two options:
- DTD
- XML Schema
Which one do you guys *really* need? What are the advantages of
DTD over XML Schema? For me, xml schema seems to be the smarter
option, but I can't be missing important things
I second this!!
On 11/16/10, Adrien de Beaupre wrote:
> I was wondering is a DTD was available for the W3AF XML output format?
> Has anyone created a parser for this output?
>
> I didn't see the answer in the user guide or mailing list archive.
>
> W3AF user.
>
> Cheers,
> Adrien de Beaupre
>
> -
11 matches
Mail list logo