Re: [waffle] [PATCH 0/8] make check cleanup & windows support

2014-08-19 Thread Chad Versace
On 08/04/2014 07:34 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: > So it seems like I've completely missed out to send this series last > week, so here it goes. > > The series covers > - Consolidates the duplicating gl_basic_test(s) into two > groups - all and all_but_cgl (as cgl is the wierd one this time). > -

[waffle] [PATCH] x11: fix for a non-zero default screen

2014-08-19 Thread Marek Olšák
From: Marek Olšák --- src/waffle/x11/x11_window.c | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/waffle/x11/x11_window.c b/src/waffle/x11/x11_window.c index 582cc02..b2e3631 100644 --- a/src/waffle/x11/x11_window.c +++ b/src/waffle/x11/x11_window.c @@ -53

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
On 19/08/14 18:44, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19 August 2014 16:51, Jose Fonseca wrote: On 19/08/14 16:41, Jose Fonseca wrote: On 19/08/14 14:43, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 14:34, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 13:42, Jose Fonseca wrote: On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: MSVC h

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 13/18] api: make dl_can_open() dl_sym() display dependent

2014-08-19 Thread Emil Velikov
Actually with my rant aside we should be safe with just opening opengl32 and returning the function pointer regardless of the API requested. I haven't checked with the specifications but I would assume that ES* would provides symbols that are already in OGL 1.0. How does this sound ? -Emil On 19

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Emil Velikov
On 19 August 2014 16:51, Jose Fonseca wrote: > On 19/08/14 16:41, Jose Fonseca wrote: >> >> On 19/08/14 14:43, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> >>> On 19/08/14 14:34, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 13:42, Jose Fonseca wrote: > > On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> MSVC h

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
On 19/08/14 16:41, Jose Fonseca wrote: On 19/08/14 14:43, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 14:34, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 13:42, Jose Fonseca wrote: On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: MSVC helps us out with the final test by undicating that we're corrupting the stack, which begs th

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
On 19/08/14 14:43, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 14:34, Emil Velikov wrote: On 19/08/14 13:42, Jose Fonseca wrote: On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: MSVC helps us out with the final test by undicating that we're corrupting the stack, which begs the question - at which point are we messi

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Emil Velikov
On 19/08/14 14:34, Emil Velikov wrote: > On 19/08/14 13:42, Jose Fonseca wrote: >> On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> MSVC helps us out with the final test by undicating that we're >>> corrupting the stack, which begs the question - at which point are we >>> messing up with the calling conv

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Emil Velikov
On 19/08/14 13:42, Jose Fonseca wrote: > On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: >> MSVC helps us out with the final test by undicating that we're >> corrupting the stack, which begs the question - at which point are we >> messing up with the calling conventions. This patch attempts to resolve >> th

Re: [waffle] [PATCH 4/4] wgl: attempt to fix the final test

2014-08-19 Thread Jose Fonseca
On 12/08/14 16:37, Emil Velikov wrote: MSVC helps us out with the final test by undicating that we're corrupting the stack, which begs the question - at which point are we messing up with the calling conventions. This patch attempts to resolve that yet the bug still persists :'( Signed-off-by: E