On 26 March 2015 at 14:50, Chad Versace wrote:
> Quoting Emil Velikov (2015-03-25 07:30:00)
>> On 24 March 2015 at 17:37, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>> > Is wcore_display_teardown called only once, or when destroying each
>> > display?
>> >
>> > If the latter, then it's not safe to call `mtx_destroy(&m
On 26 March 2015 at 16:20, Chad Versace wrote:
> Quoting Emil Velikov (2015-03-18 13:03:08)
>> On 17 March 2015 at 19:54, Chad Versace wrote:
>> > Hey Emil,
>> >
>> > The patches look good to me, though I haven't tested them yet.
>> > I'm going to run the patches through a Piglit run and, if I
>>
On 26 March 2015 at 05:56, Tapani Pälli wrote:
> On 03/25/2015 04:22 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> This is a direct copy from cgl with the following tweaks
>> - s/cgl/nacl/
>> - s/cgl_dl_gl_path/NACL_GLES2_LIBRARY/
>> - Add move the nacl_prefix function from nacl_platform.c
>>
>> Doing this
Quoting Jose Fonseca (2015-03-26 09:01:41)
> The approach we use to statically initialize critical sections on
> windows is unofficial. Read
> http://locklessinc.com/articles/pthreads_on_windows/ for the gritty details.
From the page:
#define PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER {(void*)-1,-1,0,0,0,0}
Quoting Emil Velikov (2015-03-18 13:03:08)
> On 17 March 2015 at 19:54, Chad Versace wrote:
> > Hey Emil,
> >
> > The patches look good to me, though I haven't tested them yet.
> > I'm going to run the patches through a Piglit run and, if I
> > find no regressions, I'll push them.
> Great thanks.
On 26/03/15 14:50, Chad Versace wrote:
Quoting Emil Velikov (2015-03-25 07:30:00)
On 24 March 2015 at 17:37, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Is wcore_display_teardown called only once, or when destroying each display?
If the latter, then it's not safe to call `mtx_destroy(&mutex)` on
`wcore_display_teard
Quoting Emil Velikov (2015-03-19 15:26:11)
> PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP was used for compatibility with old glibc.
> Although due to the_GNU_SOURCES define the portable,
> PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE will be available for Linuxes since at least
> 1998. Simplify things giving us compatibility with musl
Quoting Emil Velikov (2015-03-25 07:30:00)
> On 24 March 2015 at 17:37, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> > Is wcore_display_teardown called only once, or when destroying each display?
> >
> > If the latter, then it's not safe to call `mtx_destroy(&mutex)` on
> > `wcore_display_teardown`. Otherwise when wco
Thanks. I'll merge this to stable branches and master.
Quoting Frank Henigman (2015-03-23 18:34:44)
> Alpha planes are written and read, so we should ask for them in the config.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frank Henigman
> ---
> examples/gl_basic.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --g
9 matches
Mail list logo
