On 20 March 2015 at 11:46, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 19/03/15 22:26, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>
>> C11 does not specify a static initializer, based on the idea that the
>> a mutex will be platform and/or implementation dependent. As such the
>> alternative solution is to initialize the mutex with mtx_i
On 19/03/15 22:26, Emil Velikov wrote:
C11 does not specify a static initializer, based on the idea that the
a mutex will be platform and/or implementation dependent. As such the
alternative solution is to initialize the mutex with mtx_init().
This will allow us to remove the transition hack, and
C11 does not specify a static initializer, based on the idea that the
a mutex will be platform and/or implementation dependent. As such the
alternative solution is to initialize the mutex with mtx_init().
This will allow us to remove the transition hack, and in due time move
to the system's C11 thr
3 matches
Mail list logo
