Re: 10.3 to 10.3.3 upgrade

2004-03-19 Thread Ryan Schotte
James Devenish said: >Oh wow! So it is! For some reason, I find it astonishing that Apple is >continually able to web browsing faster. (Remember when graphical web >browsing used to be the "killer" app -- the app guaranteed to bring a >machine to a crashing halt?) I'm running Netscape 1.0N (circa

Re: 10.3 to 10.3.3 upgrade

2004-03-19 Thread James Devenish
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:32:25AM +0800, Peter Hinchliffe wrote: > We also get Safari 1.2.1 Oh wow! So it is! For some reason, I find it astonishing that Apple is continually able to web browsing faster. (Remember when graphical web browsing used to be the "killer"

Re: 10.3 to 10.3.3 upgrade

2004-03-18 Thread Peter Hinchliffe
On 17/03/2004, at 11:49 AM, gary dorn wrote: So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest version of the OS Well, the big thing for me is that networking finally works properly. Well worth the upgrade. We also get Safari 1.2.1, which seems to be noticeably faster. No

Re: 10.3 to 10.3.3 upgrade

2004-03-17 Thread Mike O'Grady
>> So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest >> version of the OS > > Apple rarely release updates that they don't recommend :) > > There don't seem to have been any reports of showstoppers so far. It > seems to be working ok for me. > > Thanks, > Shay If you use Final Cut

Re: 10.3 to 10.3.3 upgrade

2004-03-17 Thread Shay Telfer
So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest version of the OS Apple rarely release updates that they don't recommend :) There don't seem to have been any reports of showstoppers so far. It seems to be working ok for me. Thanks, Shay -- === Shay Te

10.3 to 10.3.3 upgrade

2004-03-17 Thread gary dorn
So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest version of the OS -- Gary Dorn Architect Perth, Australia