James Devenish said:
>Oh wow! So it is! For some reason, I find it astonishing that Apple is
>continually able to web browsing faster. (Remember when graphical web
>browsing used to be the "killer" app -- the app guaranteed to bring a
>machine to a crashing halt?)
I'm running Netscape 1.0N (circa
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 07:32:25AM +0800, Peter Hinchliffe wrote:
> We also get Safari 1.2.1
Oh wow! So it is! For some reason, I find it astonishing that Apple is
continually able to web browsing faster. (Remember when graphical web
browsing used to be the "killer"
On 17/03/2004, at 11:49 AM, gary dorn wrote:
So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest
version of the OS
Well, the big thing for me is that networking finally works properly.
Well worth the upgrade. We also get Safari 1.2.1, which seems to be
noticeably faster.
No
>> So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest
>> version of the OS
>
> Apple rarely release updates that they don't recommend :)
>
> There don't seem to have been any reports of showstoppers so far. It
> seems to be working ok for me.
>
> Thanks,
> Shay
If you use Final Cut
So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest
version of the OS
Apple rarely release updates that they don't recommend :)
There don't seem to have been any reports of showstoppers so far. It
seems to be working ok for me.
Thanks,
Shay
--
=== Shay Te
So is it recommended then that 10.3 users upgrade to the latest
version of the OS
--
Gary Dorn
Architect
Perth, Australia
6 matches
Mail list logo