Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-31 Thread Onno Benschop
On Thu, 2003-07-31 at 19:09, David Watkins wrote: > Onno > > It is getting close to a gig with the supporting applications > needed, unless my mathematics are not what they used to be. The > following is taken from the Open Office Read Me file. > > > OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 Mac OS X (X11) requires

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-31 Thread David Watkins
Onno It is getting close to a gig with the supporting applications needed, unless my mathematics are not what they used to be. The following is taken from the Open Office Read Me file. OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 Mac OS X (X11) requires the following to run: Mac OS X 10.2 or higher or Darwin 6.0 or hig

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-31 Thread Onno Benschop
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 18:29, David Watkins wrote: > Thanks to all for your comments about OpenOffice. > > Certainly got a cross section of views which is what it is all about. > > Considering the it is going to take up nearly a gig of my hard > drive OpenOffice.org a gig? I don't think so. On

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-30 Thread David Watkins
Thanks to all for your comments about OpenOffice. Certainly got a cross section of views which is what it is all about. Considering the it is going to take up nearly a gig of my hard drive and that I have MS Office on my PC, I will continue dragging files through the little network I have. If I d

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-29 Thread Paul Mulroney
Hi Everyone I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the opinion of those who have tried it out to give me some feedback as to if it is worth getting. It's

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-29 Thread Paul Mulroney
Hi Everyone, On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 05:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the opinion of those who have tried it

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-29 Thread Shay Telfer
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 21:07, David Watkins wrote: > I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the opinion of those who have tried it out to give me some feedbac

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-29 Thread Onno Benschop
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 21:07, David Watkins wrote: > I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug > site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. > > As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the > opinion of those who have tried it out to give me some f

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-28 Thread Daniel Kerr
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 9:07 PM, David Watkins wrote: I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the opinion of those who have tried it out to give me some

Re: Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-28 Thread Matthew Healey
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 9:07 PM, David Watkins wrote: I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the opinion of those who have tried it out to give me some

Mac OS X OpenOffice

2003-07-28 Thread David Watkins
I was looking at the downloads that were available on the wamug site and I and noticed that OpenOffice was there. As it is a fairly big download at 170 MB, I thought I would ask the opinion of those who have tried it out to give me some feedback as to if it is worth getting. Thanks Dave Watkins