http://www.arabtimesonline.com/kuwaitnews/faqdetails.asp?faid=1063&faqid=9


      Women can only win the day with men's support 

      
      True democracy means making choices that are good for the individual and 
his society. Before the Greek philosophers indulged in political thoughts, that 
gave birth to the notion of democracy, Old Stone Age people lived in equitable 
life, a true democracy in which both men and women shared every decision 
affecting the well-being of their community. A wealth of evidence discovered 
from the Neolithic town of Catal Huyuk in Turkey reveals a very well-planned 
and organized society, that cultivated the land and grazed animals. Their 
agricultural technology, wall paintings, metal art and sculptures show no sign 
of warfare, no slavery, nor social inequality; men and women worked in 
partnership; the needy were provided from the public store and the garden of 
the goddess. Other Neolithic cultures in the Middle East, North Africa, Europe 
and the Minoa civilization were highly advanced societies in which no ranking 
predominated.

      The harmonious interrelation of men and women changed abruptly when 
conquering nomad hunters, worshippers of a father god conquered the settlers 
and began changing their social structure, making ranking the predominant 
factor. Men projected their self-image on an authoritarian, cruel god and women 
became male property to be safeguarded and bartered. The shift from societies 
based on partnership to a society based on class structure gave birth to all 
the social illnesses that have been plaguing humanity ever since; from 
inequalities, to social injustice, to power greed, to war, revolution, slavery 
and the widening gap between the rich and the poor. Nature also suffered from 
the abusive behaviour of men exploiting natural resources in their belief that 
nature had been created to serve them.

      Philosopher
      Around the sixth century BC, philosophers Thales, Anaximander and 
Heraclitus in Grece, Lao-tse and Confucius in China, the Vedist Hindu and 
Gautama in India, and Zoroaster in Persia all saw Nature striving to create a 
balance: changing, re-establishing order and harmony from imbalance and discord 
like in human affairs. Nature is orderly but not perfect. Perfection would mean 
the end of creation, the end of evolution. Humans are not perfect, hence they 
are always striving to reach a certain order in their relation to the world and 
to their kind. The simpler the community and the closer to nature the more 
harmoniously balanced it seems to be. In more sophisticated societies, in which 
property and greed enter the human equation, harmony can still be maintained if 
equity is maintained.

      The Greeks' experiment was a democracy in a man's world, in which women 
were excluded from taking part in the political life of the nation. The 
Athenians failed in their experiment for squabbles continued - by citizens 
seeking ways of gaining power and others taking advantage of the confusion to 
try to bring back the dictators. Seeing what was going on around him, the 
playwright Aristophanes produced "Lisistrata" and "Women in Parliament", 
suggesting that women could do a better job in solving social problems of 
governments and wars than men. Socrates seeing people in the assembly throwing 
their ideas from anything that came to their mind, like builders trying to make 
a building without a plan and with any material at hand, criticized them, till 
his criticism eventually led him to his trial and execution. 2,500 years have 
passed since then, but obviously our modern version of democracy is not better 
off. What we see is squabbles for power, few indeed are those who have the 
interest of their country at heart!


      Since 1963 in Kuwait, when the first parliament was elected, to the 
present day, men representing the people have done nothing positive to gladden 
their hearts. Indeed from 1963 till now it has been a series of disappointments 
and a colossal waste of resources, time and opportunities. Not only has Kuwait, 
which used to be at the vanguard of the Gulf countries in early Sixties, has 
reached the bottom line in respect to the others, the inception of the "wasta", 
which apparently began with the inception of the parliament, has caused 
widespread injustice and corruption that needs a miracle of spring-cleaning to 
get rid of. When Aristophanes, tired of the squabbles and tension around him, 
suggested in his plays that women should run the parliament, he had a good 
point in his suggestion, for women are the powerhouse of the nation. By women I 
mean not the feminine spoiled types of the species, but the real women with a 
brain to think and the power and determination to act. Men are ready for 
action, women think before acting: they think how to put the food on the table, 
how to raise and educate their children, how to make ends meet and how to plan 
for the future by minimizing waste and making good use of every chance to 
enhance the wellbeing of their family.

      Economy means house-keeping. Who better than a woman knows how to keep 
her house in order? An orderly household is based on a balanced economy of 
equal partners. The concentration of wealth in a few hands will inevitably 
result in collapse of the system. From the time the nomad hunters conquered the 
peaceful orderly communities of settlers, they disrupted the harmonious 
male-female partnership and established a man's world. How often do we hear the 
word "mankind", as referring to the whole human species. Fighting for 
supremacy, men have invented technologies that while enhancing their power, 
have brought humanity to the edge of total destruction. At the same time 
technology did free women from the shackles of subjugation, enabling them to 
infiltrate every male domain, which had been exclusive to men. There are women 
in every field and profession, in science and technology, there are even women 
in mines and in the army. But when it comes to parliament women are shunned. 
Why? Are men so afraid of women power?

      Support
      Unfortunately we are living in a man's world and only with men's support 
will women win the day. Men, not the women, will help women move ahead and make 
their stand in society. Only men who believe in the power of women will respect 
their stand and give them a chance. In Kuwait there are men who are 
broad-minded and self-assured enough to believe that women can truly make a 
change if given a chance to enter the parliament. When Italy emerged from the 
great World War II, shaken and demoralized, in 1947 in the first parliament 
that formed 27 women were elected. Some of them had been fighting with the 
resistance against the Germans and the Fascist regime till their country was 
free. Kuwaiti women too fought in the resistance against the Iraqi invaders, 
scores of them suffered martyrdom under hideous torture. What more must they do 
to gain a voice in parliament and do something for their country?


      Italy in the aftermath of the great war was at the bedrock of its economy 
out with a man, a patriot in power and women in parliament supporting his 
endeavors, Italy not only regained its dignity in the world, but within a short 
time it emerged from the ashes of war, into one of the ten great powers. Kuwait 
is going through a difficult phase in which women power can help. The greatest 
challenge Kuwait is facing is a spring-cleaning in the system to clear away the 
wasta and the corruption it is causing. Incidentally is it the spring-cleaning 
that many men in the parliament are afraid of! The democracy practiced by the 
Athenians effectively weakened their brilliant civilization, the same thing has 
been happening to Kuwait, which was stronger and healthier before the one-sided 
parliament came into power.


      By Lidia Qattan
      Kuwaiti artist, writer
     


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kirim email ke