In a message dated 6/22/02 6:11:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any disputes about US sovereignty or the rights of an American citizen will be decided by the United States Supreme Court, with the full power of the US Government to back it up.
=
Works for Me! :)
Lawana
rod/christine wrote:
>
> Sure, read it twice, once high school & other time during the Gulf
> War... and it is a piece of BS! All the Security Resolutions that are
> "binding" are the ones to watch out for.
>
> Well, the Supreme Court is packed with a bunch of people selected
> (confirm
Al Winslow wrote:
>
> rod/christine wrote:
>
> >
> > "We", the USA, are a Member "State" of the UN - and are treaty-bound by
> > the Edicts that are passed (enacted) in the Security Council of 15.
> >
> > You know - the Treaty to "join" the United Nations was approved by the
> > Senate - w
rod/christine wrote:
>
> "We", the USA, are a Member "State" of the UN - and are treaty-bound by
> the Edicts that are passed (enacted) in the Security Council of 15.
>
> You know - the Treaty to "join" the United Nations was approved by the
> Senate - way back in 1944.
>
> I receive a Dail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/20/02 10:41:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > No, the Senate does not have a "say" in the matter.
>
> =
> I didn't see this addressed in the article (or if it was, it went right
> over
> my head...)
> Doesn't ou
In a message dated 6/21/02 2:49:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"We", the USA, are a Member "State" of the UN - and are treaty-bound by
the Edicts that are passed (enacted) in the Security Council of 15.
You know - the Treaty to "join" the United Nations was approved by th
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/20/02 10:41:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> > No, the Senate does not have a "say" in the matter.
>
> =
> I didn't see this addressed in the article (or if it was, it went right
> over
> my head...)
> Doesn't o
In a message dated 6/20/02 10:41:18 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, the Senate does not have a "say" in the matter.
=
I didn't see this addressed in the article (or if it was, it went right over my head...)
Doesn't our Constitution demand that ALL treaties have to be r
