Two turrets per body - this is new and very cool.
So far only AI has them. Seems to work well.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >> 6. Copy src/version.c.tmpl to src/version.c and adjust the
> >> version/revision numbers
> >>Note: If you intend to distribute the compiled binary those
> >> numbers need to be accurate!"
> >
> >Where did you get that from? version.c was re
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sun, 06 May 2007 18:33:13 -0400 Dennis Schridde
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 18:08:12 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
>>>
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> On Sun,
On Sun, 06 May 2007 18:33:13 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 18:08:12 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
>>
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
>> >> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:50:50 -0400 Giel va
Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sun, 06 May 2007 18:08:12 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> >> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:50:50 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
> >>
> >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> >
On Sun, 06 May 2007 18:08:12 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:50:50 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
>>>
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:50:50 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
>>
>>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
Ok, then we probably don't need CMake.
Hylke schreef:
> After analising this assert (see below) I think this is the problem:
> The droid is in status MOVEPOINTTOPOINT, but it's target X and target Y
> are it's current position.
> This results in move.c:3804 moveGetDirection(psDroid, &tx,&ty); to set
> tx and ty to NAN
> this results in
Hylke schreef:
> After analising this assert (see below) I think this is the problem:
> The droid is in status MOVEPOINTTOPOINT, but it's target X and target Y
> are it's current position.
> This results in move.c:3804 moveGetDirection(psDroid, &tx,&ty); to set
> tx and ty to NAN
> this results in
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Jose Ivey:
> Same here - mingw/msys won't work. But MSVC works just fine with latest
> versions.
Err... No HTML mails please... *Must setup MM to reject them*
Wont work = ?
--Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:50:50 -0400 Giel van Schijndel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
>> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> Ok, then we probably don't need CMake. At least not for MacOS.
>>> The current Autotools seem
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Ok, then we probably don't need CMake. At least not for MacOS.
>> The current Autotools seem to work quite nicely, raw is maintained
>> by Giel, which leaves only the poor MSVC use
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> >> On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PR
On Sun, 06 May 2007 17:29:20 -0400 Dennis Schridde
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
>> On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > As you say that you use Xcode, that implies that
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
>
>> On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>> As you say that you use Xcode, that implies that the AC_DEFINE I added to
>>> configure.ac is unnecessary for you?
>>> It is probably unecessary fo
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As you say that you use Xcode, that implies that the AC_DEFINE I added
> > > to configure.ac is unnecessary for you?
> > > It is pro
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As you say that you use Xcode, that implies that the AC_DEFINE I added to
> > configure.ac is unnecessary for you?
> > It is probably unecessary for anyone else, since we also require
> >
After analising this assert (see below) I think this is the problem:
The droid is in status MOVEPOINTTOPOINT, but it's target X and target Y
are it's current position.
This results in move.c:3804 moveGetDirection(psDroid, &tx,&ty); to set
tx and ty to NAN
this results in tangle = vectorToAngle(tx,
On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > As you say that you use Xcode, that implies that the AC_DEFINE I added to
> > configure.ac is unnecessary for you?
> > It is probably unecessary for anyone else, since we also require
On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you say that you use Xcode, that implies that the AC_DEFINE I added to
> configure.ac is unnecessary for you?
> It is probably unecessary for anyone else, since we also require
> AC_GNU_SOURCE, which implies _XOPEN_SOURCE=600 and thus also
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > does this work. Are we including that? If so, maybe
> > > > _XOPEN_SOURCE is not being defined consistently in our code.
> > >
On 5/6/07, Per Inge Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > does this work. Are we including that? If so, maybe
> > > _XOPEN_SOURCE is not being defined consistently in our code.
> > On GNU/Linux it is done by features.h, which is include
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> *) autoconf, raw makefiles, waf, cmake, xcode and msvc. (Yes, this is
> not good state of affairs.)
>
I agree that this is not good at all. In fact I think it'd be good if we
would start dropping some of them. Or replacing some of them with more
generic/portable syst
Hylke schreef:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> SP game.
>>
>> In game.c line 6092 (on save)
>>
>> psSaveDroid->formationDir= psCurr->sMove.psFormation->dir;
>>
>> psSaveDroid 0x0441b034 {name=0x0441b034 "Machinegunner"
>> id=0xcdcdcdcd x=0xcdcdcdcd ...} _save_droid *
>>
>> 0xcdcd
On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > does this work. Are we including that? If so, maybe
> > _XOPEN_SOURCE is not being defined consistently in our code.
> On GNU/Linux it is done by features.h, which is included by unistd.h.
> The problem might be that somewhere in frame.h
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> > > On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> > > > > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 200
Hi,
In game.c 6090 is:
if (psSaveDroid->sMove.psFormation != NULL)
Shouldn't that be:
if (psCurr->sMove.psFormation != NULL)
As the copying is done from psCurr to psSaveDriod, checking for the
source to exist in the target doesn't make much sense, does it.
Hylke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> SP g
On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> > On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Ari Johnson:
> On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> > > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] warzone]$ svn log -r 864
> > > > -
On 5/6/07, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> > Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] warzone]$ svn log -r 864
> > >
> > > r864
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Dennis Schridde:
> Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] warzone]$ svn log -r 864
> >
> > r864 | devurandom | 2007-03-10 20:43:02 +0100 (Sat, 10 Mar 2007) | 5
Am Sonntag, 6. Mai 2007 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] warzone]$ svn log -r 864
>
> r864 | devurandom | 2007-03-10 20:43:02 +0100 (Sat, 10 Mar 2007) | 5 lines
>
> - New macro: WZ_OS_POSIX (if _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] warzone]$ svn log -r 864
r864 | devurandom | 2007-03-10 20:43:02 +0100 (Sat, 10 Mar 2007) | 5 lines
- New macro: WZ_OS_POSIX (if _XOPEN_SOURCE >= 500)
- Added a bit more safety to WZ_DECL_UNUSED (not sure si
34 matches
Mail list logo
