#981: Game state is not reset after a corrupted savegame file is loaded
-+--
Reporter: anonymous |Type: defect
Status: new |Priority: major
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Zarel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Per Inge Mathisen
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Zarel wrote:
>>> Yeah, let's just rename 2.4 to 3.0 alpha 1.
>>
>> Which part of the arguments against this that were previously
>> presented did you not
#702: VTOL Rearming Pads can float and/or go underground
---+
Reporter: TonyTheSlayer | Owner: Per
Type: defect | Status: accepted
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Kreuvf wrote:
> So what's the goal of that "2.4" release? And by reserving "2.3" number space
> people could easily expect 2.3 from us at some point, although it may never
> come. We lack the manpower to maintain two branches and trunk.
2.3 will definitely come. E
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:30 PM, Per Inge Mathisen
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Zarel wrote:
>> Yeah, let's just rename 2.4 to 3.0 alpha 1.
>
> Which part of the arguments against this that were previously
> presented did you not agree with?
Alphas don't need to be feature-complete,
#702: VTOL Rearming Pads can float and/or go underground
---+
Reporter: TonyTheSlayer | Owner: Per
Type: defect | Status: accepted
On Monday, 5 October 2009 at 12:20, Zarel wrote:
> 2009/10/5 Kreuvf :
> > So what's the goal of that "2.4" release? And by reserving "2.3" number
> > space
> > people could easily expect 2.3 from us at some point, although it may never
> > come. We lack the manpower to maintain two branches and t
hey all
> Yeah, let's just rename 2.4 to 3.0 alpha 1.
>
> -Zarel
may i just pop in and say betawidget among others were intended to be
3.0
regards
elio
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Zarel wrote:
> Yeah, let's just rename 2.4 to 3.0 alpha 1.
Which part of the arguments against this that were previously
presented did you not agree with?
- Per
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https:/
2009/10/5 Kreuvf :
> So what's the goal of that "2.4" release? And by reserving "2.3" number space
> people could easily expect 2.3 from us at some point, although it may never
> come. We lack the manpower to maintain two branches and trunk.
Yeah, let's just rename 2.4 to 3.0 alpha 1.
-Zarel
___
Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> After a quick discussion on IRC, I would like to propose a different
> versioning. I'd like to see a trunk alpha soon. However, since trunk
> does not yet contain the big incompatibilities that we foresaw for 3.0
> (new savegame format, lua port), we should wait with the
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 9:57 PM, bugs buggy wrote:
> Why? Look at the code, it isn't that complex in what it does, and
> now that it is in both trunk & branch/2.2, we can have plenty of
> testing before the release of the next version next week... Hear
> that testers? We need your help :)
It'
12 matches
Mail list logo
