On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 22:14, Fastdeath wrote:
> Would be nice to have packages for different architectures/versions.
>
> As example:
> 1.) Debian Lenny
> 2.) Debian Etch
> 3.) Ubuntu Lucid
> 4.) Ubuntu Karmic
Etch? That seems quite old to me... But I think a package b
Then i realy like this :-)
On 2010-07-23 22:22, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 22:10, Rene jochum wrote:
>> There's another disadvantage, users have to findout theier version
>> and rename it, except if you do that in code.
>
> Well, I said "two extra files", that would search f
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 22:10, Rene jochum wrote:
> There's another disadvantage, users have to findout theier version
> and rename it, except if you do that in code.
Well, I said "two extra files", that would search for the new files in addition
to the old one. Removing the old name seems like
Would be nice to have packages for different architectures/versions.
As example:
1.) Debian Lenny
2.) Debian Etch
3.) Ubuntu Lucid
4.) Ubuntu Karmic
To be True i don't known howto make them, but i think we/i could create
an https://launchpad.net/ account to automa
There's another disadvantage, users have to findout theier version
and rename it, except if you do that in code.
On 2010-07-23 21:53, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 14:45, Guangcong Luo wrote:
>> And really zero disadvantages.
>
> Except that it'll complicate the code a bit more
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 14:45, Guangcong Luo wrote:
> And really zero disadvantages.
Except that it'll complicate the code a bit more if we have to look for two
extra files.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listin
Hey, guys.
We (dak180 and I) have been thinking about it for a while. We think
sequences.wz should be renamed to videos-sd.wz and videos-lq.wz.
The main reason for this change is that we need something other than
filesize to tell video quality. There are a few primary advantages to
doing this:
1
On Friday, 23 July 2010 at 15:05, buginator wrote:
> On 7/22/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
> > Fine by me, probably. As you might have noticed, I've updated the Debian
> > packaging so we can offer .debs, let's see how much feedback that gets.
>
> We would then make both tarballs and .debs ?
> Isn't t
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:06 PM, buginator wrote:
> I still don't see the reason for this. If it is a script, then it can
> rename whatever version the person wants just like we do for windows
> installer.
The main reason is that different filenames makes it easier to tell
whether high quality v
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 2:11 PM, buginator wrote:
> The way you did it here is with magic numbers, that can't possibly
> work with whatever font the user picks...
Nope, it'll only look right with the default font. But whatever font
Warzone looks best with should be the default font.
> I also don
On 7/18/10, zare...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Revision: 11231
>
> http://warzone2100.svn.sourceforge.net/warzone2100/?rev=11231&view=rev
> Author: zarelsl
> Date: 2010-07-18 23:38:56 + (Sun, 18 Jul 2010)
>
> Log Message:
> ---
> Fix bug #1994 - hack some `#if
On 7/22/10, dak180 wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2010, at 9:19 PM, Guangcong Luo wrote:
>
> > At the same time, I'd like to consolidate the video location to one
> > place. To do that, however, we'd need to get PhysFS to search
> > /Library/Application Support/Warzone 2100/sequences.wz, which I can't
> >
On 7/22/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
> On Thursday, 22 July 2010 at 15:23, buginator wrote:
> > Using SF & trac, I have come up with these changes so far, I think we
> > should try for a 2.3.2 release this weekend.
>
> Fine by me, probably. As you might have noticed, I've updated the Debian
> packag
#2015: can't click "READY", assert failed
---+
Reporter: hao |Type: bug
Status: new |Priority: major
Milestone: unspecified | C
14 matches
Mail list logo
