> > Then maybe XML (yes, they are bloated) using XPath to query the
> > information? Implementing a database engine just to load some stats
> > looks for me like breaking a butterfly on a wheel.
>
it's easy to have that impression, but sqlite is no oracle or mysql -- there
is no client/server rela
Hi,
> Then maybe XML (yes, they are bloated) using XPath to query the
> information? Implementing a database engine just to load some stats
> looks for me like breaking a butterfly on a wheel.
Modelling such data in XML would be a poor use of it. XML makes sense
for reports (as you can XSLT it
Dennis Schridde schreef:
> Another question: Why does that DB have the need-lock property? Sounds like
> reviving RCS or something...
Because having to perform a 3-way merge on a binary blob is far from nice.
--
Giel
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
Kamaze schreef:
> Freddie Witherden schrieb:
>> JSON does not make a lot of sense for the stats; one of the advantages to
>> SQL is that it can be easily queried. Storing the stats in a JSON file
>> would simplify the parsing (compared to what we have now) but that is about
>> it. We would still ne
Then maybe XML (yes, they are bloated) using XPath to query the
information? Implementing a database engine just to load some stats
looks for me like breaking a butterfly on a wheel.
Freddie Witherden schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:38:26 +0100, Kamaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Th
Hi,
On Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:38:26 +0100, Kamaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Throw in: What about JSON?
JSON does not make a lot of sense for the stats; one of the advantages to
SQL is that it can be easily queried. Storing the stats in a JSON file
would simplify the parsing (compared to what we
Throw in: What about JSON?
Dennis Schridde schrieb:
> Hi!
>
> I see, we are going to use SQLite for stats now?
> When and where was that decided and by whom?
> What are the implications and benefits?
>
> --Dennis
>
>
>
>
Am Montag, 3. März 2008 08:38:06 schrieb Per Inge Mathisen:
> On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I see, we are going to use SQLite for stats now?
>
> That was the idea.
>
> > When and where was that decided and by whom?
>
> Apparently, another defectiv
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
> ... This way you can use a database editing tool (several exist, ask
> Giel) to modify it, and eventually we will want our own custom tool
> (the proposed "Warzone studio" application).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SQLite#Clients_for_managing_SQLite_databases
--
Giel
On Mon, Mar 3, 2008 at 12:54 AM, Dennis Schridde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I see, we are going to use SQLite for stats now?
That was the idea.
> When and where was that decided and by whom?
Apparently, another defective decision process. This is my fault. It
was "only" discussed by several
Hi!
I see, we are going to use SQLite for stats now?
When and where was that decided and by whom?
What are the implications and benefits?
--Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone
11 matches
Mail list logo
