On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:03:44PM -0500, dak180 wrote:
>
> We do not actually use the hosted trac on SF.
Good point!
> I am more concerned about svn+ssh, looking at the svn manual they do not
> recommend using it.
> For full encryption they recommend svnserve with SASL encryption instead.
>
>
On Feb 11, 2010, at 10:17 PM, Stephen Swaney wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:33:11PM -0500, buginator wrote:
>> =
>> Note that this new environment has the following up-front limitations:
>>
>> * No integration with the trac hosted app
>>
On Fri, Feb 05, 2010 at 09:33:11PM -0500, buginator wrote:
> =
> Note that this new environment has the following up-front limitations:
>
> * No integration with the trac hosted app
> * No stats tracking -- changes that occur while this is
buginator wrote:
> =
> Note that this new environment has the following up-front limitations:
>
> * No integration with the trac hosted app
> * No stats tracking -- changes that occur while this is in test stage
> may not ever get reflecte
=
Note that this new environment has the following up-front limitations:
* No integration with the trac hosted app
* No stats tracking -- changes that occur while this is in test stage
may not ever get reflected in the site stats.
* L
