On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Safety0ff safety0ff@gmail.com wrote:
Next subject: Opinions on moving miniupnpc from lib/netplay to somewhere
else?
I don't really care either way. If you feel like moving it, I'm fine with that.
- Per
___
It seems there isn't enough support for this change (moving lib/* to src/).
Next subject: Opinions on moving miniupnpc from lib/netplay to somewhere
else?
___
Warzone-dev mailing list
Warzone-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/warzone-dev
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Safety0ff safety0ff@gmail.com wrote:
While working on a CMake build system I took the opportunity to move the
contents from lib to src.
Generally, I am worried that we are now making so many huge changes to
the codebase that all existing patches soon have to
On Saturday, 15 January 2011 at 1:18, Safety0ff wrote:
Hi all,
While working on a CMake build system I took the opportunity to move
the contents from lib to src.
I don't see what that gains us, to me it'll only lead to confusion between old
and new layout and breaking of existing
On Jan 15, 2011, at 4:01 AM, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:18 AM, Safety0ff safety0ff@gmail.com wrote:
While working on a CMake build system I took the opportunity to move the
contents from lib to src.
I have no objection to the reorganising of the code base; in
On 11-01-15 04:01 AM, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
Generally, I am worried that we are now making so many huge changes to
the codebase that all existing patches soon have to be written from
scratch. This is not cool.
Specifically, I do not see a good reason for this change. Compiling
parts of a
Hi all,
While working on a CMake build system I took the opportunity to move the
contents from lib to src.
The rationale for this was:
1) It helped me to keep the build system rational without compiling some
of the parts into libraries (like the current system does.)
2) lib is more commonly
