On Jan 29, 2010, at 10:16 PM, buginator wrote:
> I can take care of the MSVC files, that shouldn't be a problem. I
> have made Qt stuff before with it.
I have run into some issues trying to get the qt stuff working with xcode (my
first time working with qt, so ok); you (or anyone else) would n
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 4:16 AM, buginator wrote:
> Since the Qt branch was inactive (as in, everyone not committing
> patches to it) for a long period of time, have you tried a test merge
> (to a new branch?) first to make sure all is OK?
Once there is agreement that a merge can be done, that sh
On Thursday, 28 January 2010 at 13:48, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> The Qt port branch has come a long way recently, and now runs entirely
> without SDL and QuesoGLC (and all its dependencies). I would like to
> merge it into trunk soon, so I would encourage everyone to take the
> branch for a test r
On 1/28/10, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Qt port branch has come a long way recently, and now runs entirely
> without SDL and QuesoGLC (and all its dependencies). I would like to
> merge it into trunk soon, so I would encourage everyone to take the
> branch for a test run, and see
On Jan 28, 2010, at 7:48 AM, Per Inge Mathisen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The Qt port branch has come a long way recently, and now runs entirely
> without SDL and QuesoGLC (and all its dependencies). I would like to
> merge it into trunk soon, so I would encourage everyone to take the
> branch for a tes
Hello,
The Qt port branch has come a long way recently, and now runs entirely
without SDL and QuesoGLC (and all its dependencies). I would like to
merge it into trunk soon, so I would encourage everyone to take the
branch for a test run, and see if you can find issues in it that need
to be address
