Speaking as someone who is definitely OO-challenged and a barely competent
Ruby scripter, I like the simplicity of what Chris did, I can understand it
right away. If I were someone just starting out on Watir, it would make
sense to me.
-- Lisa
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:08 AM, Chris McMahon <
chris
Bret gave a good summary on his most recent blog post:
http://www.io.com/~wazmo/blog/archives/2009_04.html#000293
Charley Baker
blog: http://blog.charleybaker.org/
Lead Developer, Watir, http://wtr.rubyforge.org
QA Architect, Gap Inc Direct
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 9:00 AM, George wrote:
>
>
On Apr 29, 12:47 am, JArkelen wrote:
> It wasn't broad criticism, it was just my 2 cents about combining test
> data and object data.
I don't know what you mean by "object data". Probably a character
flaw on my part, but that's why I was hoping for an example of what
you meant. And since the
Maybe this speaks of my programming ignorance, but what exactly
constitutes a "test harness"? I hear this phrase bandied about, but
I'm not sure I have a solid grasp of what this actually means.
I hope this isn't hijacking the thread, but I would really like a
better understanding. I know with
It wasn't broad criticism, it was just my 2 cents about combining test
data and object data.
Any attempt to develop a framework/directory structure/harness/
whatever should be applauded, because it will make watir more mature
and usable in my opinion.
Cheers,
John
On Apr 29, 1:48 am, Chris McMah
On Apr 28, 8:56 am, JArkelen wrote:
> No, I have my own framework/directory structure for my tests and I'm
> perfectly happy with it.
It seems hardly sporting to issue such a broad criticism and then
leave without an example. :-)
I wrote this to illustrate some principles of UI-test design,
No, I have my own framework/directory structure for my tests and I'm
perfectly happy with it.
On Apr 28, 4:36 pm, Chris McMahon
wrote:
> On Apr 28, 12:13 am, JArkelen wrote:
>
> > I can imagine why you want to separate the test data from the test
> > script, but mixing it with the object data m
On Apr 28, 12:13 am, JArkelen wrote:
> I can imagine why you want to separate the test data from the test
> script, but mixing it with the object data makes it confusing in my
> opinion.
> It would be better to separate both the test data and the object data
> to start with.
Probably so.
Want
I can imagine why you want to separate the test data from the test
script, but mixing it with the object data makes it confusing in my
opinion.
It would be better to separate both the test data and the object data
to start with.
Cheers,
John
On Apr 28, 2:45 am, Wesley Chen wrote:
> That maybe a
That maybe a frame, but I think it is not housed well enough.
Thanks.
Wesley Chen.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:33 AM, Chris wrote:
> ate it if you let me know.
>
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Wat
10 matches
Mail list logo
