On Friday, September 09, 2011 2:01 PM, "Christian Grobmeier"
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Jasper Horn wrote:
> > Yuri wrote:
> >> The decision is obviously to migrate to SVN, the only question is whether
> >> it
> >> will be with a clean check in, or with history.
> >
> > It has pr
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Jasper Horn wrote:
> Yuri wrote:
>> The decision is obviously to migrate to SVN, the only question is whether it
>> will be with a clean check in, or with history.
>
> It has probably already been discussed, but I wasn't able to find such
> a discussion. Neither was
Yes, they do, it should be hosted on Apache infra. You can have mirror repos
if you wish.
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Jasper Horn wrote:
> Yuri wrote:
> > The decision is obviously to migrate to SVN, the only question is whether
> it
> > will be with a clean check in, or with history.
>
> It
Yuri wrote:
> The decision is obviously to migrate to SVN, the only question is whether it
> will be with a clean check in, or with history.
It has probably already been discussed, but I wasn't able to find such
a discussion. Neither was I able to find official ASF policy on the
matter, but I may
I agree. We should move to the Apache infra whatever are the costs.
Therefore I suggest:
1. Freeze all commits to the google-code repo from NOW.
2. All future patches will be pushed to the new Apache Wave SVN.
3. Settle a deadline for the migration - I propose it to be 18-th
September
I've posted a stack overflow question about xmpp servers here, and I'd
appreciate it if any of you guys in the know have any comments:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7359272/is-it-worth-customizing-an-xmpp-server-vs-having-client-workers
Basic question is; was it worth it doing a custom xmpp s
