[GitHub] incubator-wave pull request: WAVE-438 - Removes XMPP federation im...

2016-05-06 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/pull/15 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] incubator-wave pull request: WAVE-438 - Removes XMPP federation im...

2016-05-06 Thread vega113
GitHub user vega113 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave/pull/15 WAVE-438 - Removes XMPP federation implementation along with relevant… … resources and unit tests. Fixes issue with a test when running with Java1.8. You can merge this pull

Re: XMPP

2016-04-25 Thread Yuri Z
Let's just remove the federation along with xmpp. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > Hello all, > > seems the wave build is failing on XMPP tests, I am unfamiliar with this > and need some assistance. Errors should occur on any fresh copy (tried it >

XMPP

2016-04-25 Thread Evan Hughes
Hello all, seems the wave build is failing on XMPP tests, I am unfamiliar with this and need some assistance. Errors should occur on any fresh copy (tried it myself on multiple). If you dont get any errors on `./gradlew test` please let me know. ~ Evan Hughes

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xmpp/component/Log while attempting federation

2014-08-31 Thread Silicon Dragon
For future prosperity: a workaround for this until logging is fixed: * download & compile whack from source using Ant * merge target/classes/org/xmpp (along build/lib/merge/stringpep.jar) with to the result .jar * copy the resulting jar to third_party/runtime/whack.jar ;delete whack.zip

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xmpp/component/Log while attempting federation

2014-08-31 Thread Ali Lown
That server is due an upgrade. (IIRC it is running ~rc3). I agree that it broke in the xmpp upgrade. Looks like the Log class doesn't exist any more, and we should change it to use the the WIAB logging infastructure. I have exams on Monday+Tuesday, so I don't have time to look into

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xmpp/component/Log while attempting federation

2014-08-31 Thread Yuri Z
otocol.box.server.rpc.ServerRpcProvider > > > parseAddressList > > > WARNING: Ignoring duplicate address in http addresses list: Duplicate > > entry > > > 'localhost:9898' resolved to 127.0.0.1 > > > > > > Exception in thread &qu

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xmpp/component/Log while attempting federation

2014-08-31 Thread Silicon Dragon
> parseAddressList > > WARNING: Ignoring duplicate address in http addresses list: Duplicate > entry > > 'localhost:9898' resolved to 127.0.0.1 > > > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > > org/xmpp/component/Log &g

Re: java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xmpp/component/Log while attempting federation

2014-08-30 Thread Yuri Z
noring duplicate address in http addresses list: Duplicate entry > 'localhost:9898' resolved to 127.0.0.1 > > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: > org/xmpp/component/Log > at > > org.waveprotocol.wave.federation.xmpp.Compone

java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/xmpp/component/Log while attempting federation

2014-08-30 Thread Silicon Dragon
: [wave.myhosthere.com] Aug 30, 2014 5:19:21 PM org.waveprotocol.box.server.rpc.ServerRpcProvider parseAddressList WARNING: Ignoring duplicate address in http addresses list: Duplicate entry 'localhost:9898' resolved to 127.0.0.1 Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: or

Peer xmpp client as server question.

2011-09-09 Thread Doug
I've posted a stack overflow question about xmpp servers here, and I'd appreciate it if any of you guys in the know have any comments: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7359272/is-it-worth-customizing-an-xmpp-server-vs-having-client-workers Basic question is; was it worth it doing a c

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-11 Thread Michael MacFadden
pment, I think both would proceed >>> faster if they wernt so tied together. >>> >>> -Thomas >>> >>>> On Apr 9, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: >>>> >>>>> Remember there is strong pro XMPP voices here too; >>

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-11 Thread Yuri Z.
er. >> >> -Thomas >> >>> On Apr 9, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: >>> >>>> Remember there is strong pro XMPP voices here too; >>>> http://www.process-one.net/en/blogs/article/xwave_a_tribute_to_google_wave_team/ >>>>

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-11 Thread Paul Thomas
t. Client should be able to be independent from wave server. --- On Mon, 11/4/11, Nelson Silva wrote: > From: Nelson Silva > Subject: Re: XMPP over websockets > To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org > Date: Monday, 11 April, 2011, 14:28 > I believe WAIB should be split into > mod

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-11 Thread Nelson Silva
wrote: Remember there is strong pro XMPP voices here too; http://www.process-one.net/en/blogs/article/xwave_a_tribute_to_google_wave_team/ I'm not sure who is right on a technical sense, but there is working xmpp based federations out there, are their any based on http? Regarding the c/

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-11 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Michael Couldn't possibly agree more with that! It would be nice if client development could be done relatively independently from server development, I think both would proceed faster if they wernt so tied together. -Thomas > > On Apr 9, 2011, at 3:32 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote: > >

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-09 Thread Michael MacFadden
Very good point. I am not for or against XMPP. I would however say that the reasons for selecting XMPP in the first place are a bit unclear and there is a debate going on in the community. My only caution would be that I would like to see that resolved before we add XMPP to the c/s protocol

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-09 Thread Paul Thomas
personally I think using xmpp for c/s is unnecessary for now. - Original Message From: Thomas Wrobel To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: Michael MacFadden Sent: Sat, 9 April, 2011 23:32:38 Subject: Re: XMPP over websockets Remember there is strong pro XMPP voices here too; http

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-09 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Remember there is strong pro XMPP voices here too; http://www.process-one.net/en/blogs/article/xwave_a_tribute_to_google_wave_team/ I'm not sure who is right on a technical sense, but there is working xmpp based federations out there, are their any based on http? Regarding the c/s pro

Re: XMPP over websockets

2011-04-09 Thread Michael MacFadden
Nelson, There has been large debate on XMPP in wave. The general complaint is that the protocol is to verbose. My two cents are that one of the main points of XMPP was a verbose XML human readable protocol with standard extension mechanisms. However wave uses protobufs and base64 encodes

XMPP over websockets

2011-04-09 Thread Nelson Silva
XMPP over websockets was proposed as a draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-moffitt-xmpp-over-websocket-00) and ejabberd now has a sample module to support it: http://blog.superfeedr.com/xmpp-over-websockets/ Wouldn't it be great to use XMPP for both C/S and federation ? or is it

Re: Federation and XMPP

2011-02-16 Thread Yuri Z
ration 2011/2/16 Branden Martin > Hi everyone, > > > > > > I've been trying to find some documentation on how to get Federation set > up. > > > > > I know you need an XMPP server. > > Is this included in WiaB? > > Or is there something extra t

Federation and XMPP

2011-02-16 Thread Branden Martin
Hi everyone, I've been trying to find some documentation on how to get Federation set up. I know you need an XMPP server. Is this included in WiaB? Or is there something extra that is needed? Are there any current guides on getting Federation working? Pleas