This patch appears to stabilize the issue reported at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72845
I could not get Weston to crash in 20+ attempts to
replicate.
U. Artie Eoff
> -Original Message-
> From: wayland-devel-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org
> [mailto:wayland-devel-boun...@
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:13:03PM +0300, Artsiom Anikeyenka wrote:
> That's absolutely right and I realize that very well. But you need to think
> of total newcomers (as I am). I like graphics and I decided to look around
> how that stuff works nowadays under the hood. To have a big picture, befor
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 02:10:20PM -0800, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 06:13:03PM +0300, Artsiom Anikeyenka wrote:
> > That's absolutely right and I realize that very well. But you need to think
> > of total newcomers (as I am). I like graphics and I decided to look around
> >
On 13/12/13 19:11, Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> I'm curious how your rogue program could modify the link-time
> environment of a running Wayland compositor.
It doesn't have to attack the compositor, it can attack the clients instead.
To demonstrate that this is not just speculation on my part, I wen
Pekka,
Thanks for looking at them!
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 2:17 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:56:17 -0600
> Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> > This series adds a wl_debug function and associated handler that can
> > be set by the uesr. The first patch is merely a rename to prepa
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
This version of the patch adds a wl_array_vprintf function if we want it.
Both versions accomplish exactly the same thing as far as the series is
concerned. However, wl_array_vprintf might be nice in the future. Feel
free to use whichever one you prefer.
src/
On Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:17:12 +
Neil Roberts wrote:
> This problem was found while looking at the following bug:
>
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72612
>
> It turns out the patch doesn't help to fix the bug but I think it
> would be a good thing to do anyway.
>
> --- >8
From: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira
Remove those listeners when the output is destroyed, otherwise they'll
point to invalid data that may lead to corruption when assigning a new
output for the view.
--
This is possibly related to bug 72845. I didn't have enough equipment
to try and reproduce it.
This problem was found while looking at the following bug:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72612
It turns out the patch doesn't help to fix the bug but I think it
would be a good thing to do anyway.
--- >8 --- (use git am --scissors to automatically chop here)
The s
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Artsiom Anikeyenka
wrote:
> That's absolutely right and I realize that very well. But you need to
> think of total newcomers (as I am). I like graphics and I decided to look
> around how that stuff works nowadays under the hood. To have a big picture,
> before I s
That's absolutely right and I realize that very well. But you need to think
of total newcomers (as I am). I like graphics and I decided to look around
how that stuff works nowadays under the hood. To have a big picture, before
I start implementing something on top of that. I don't know X11 and I do
The views on hiden workspace can't restored correctly when their
output was unplugged. There are two reasons:
First: the views on hiden workspace is restored through animation
which will change y coordinate continually, if the y coordinate of
invisible views are setted to first_output->height/4,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 20:56:17 -0600
Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This series adds a wl_debug function and associated handler that can
> be set by the uesr. The first patch is merely a rename to prepare
> for the third. The second adds a useful helper function used by the
> third.
>
> Jason Ekstrand (
13 matches
Mail list logo
