Re: [PATCH wayland v2] wayland-server: abort instead of posting events with wrong client objects

2016-12-09 Thread Giulio Camuffo
2016-12-08 20:36 GMT+01:00 Derek Foreman : > Check that all the objects in an event belong to the same client as > the resource posting it. This prevents a compositor from accidentally > mixing client objects and posting an event that causes a client to > kill itself. > > It's intended that the co

Re: [PATCH wayland v2] wayland-server: abort instead of posting events with wrong client objects

2016-12-09 Thread Yong Bakos
Hi Derek, > On Dec 8, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Derek Foreman wrote: > > Check that all the objects in an event belong to the same client as > the resource posting it. This prevents a compositor from accidentally > mixing client objects and posting an event that causes a client to > kill itself. > >

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] Color management protocol

2016-12-09 Thread Niels Ole Salscheider
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016, 15:51:12 CET schrieb Graeme Gill: > Niels Ole Salscheider wrote: > > Therefore I think that the situation has changed and I'd like to propose > > this protocol for inclusion in wayland-protocols again. > > What do you think? > > Hi, > I'm prompted to look int

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] Color management protocol

2016-12-09 Thread Niels Ole Salscheider
Am Donnerstag, 8. Dezember 2016, 13:33:20 CET schrieb Graeme Gill: > Niels Ole Salscheider wrote: > > Hi, > > > The first version of my proposal had such a flag. I removed it and > > replaced it by the described version based on feedback from Zoxc > > (zox...@gmail.com). > Do you have a link to t

Re: [RFC wayland-protocols] Color management protocol

2016-12-09 Thread Niels Ole Salscheider
Am Freitag, 9. Dezember 2016, 12:02:07 CET schrieb Carsten Haitzler: > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 17:32:37 +1100 Graeme Gill said: > > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > i'm curious... is the intent to make it requird that all compositors > > > support color management (and thus have to support

Wayland triggering automated bug reports mechanism? (Re: [RFC wayland] wayland-server: assert instead of posting events with wrong client objects)

2016-12-09 Thread Pekka Paalanen
On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 16:01:55 -0600 Derek Foreman wrote: > On 08/12/16 02:54 PM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Dec 2016 13:28:41 -0600 > > Derek Foreman wrote: > > > >> On 02/12/16 02:07 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > >>> IMO, your check should not be an assert, it should be an uncondition

<    1   2