On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 12:34:42 +0530
Sameer Lattannavar wrote:
> This is an extension for wl_surface interface to support
> setting scaling filter. Client can request set_scaling_filter.
>
> Protocol implementation posted at:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2019-December/041
This is an extension for wl_surface interface to support
setting scaling filter. Client can request set_scaling_filter.
Protocol implementation posted at:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2019-December/041098.html
Signed-off-by: Sameer Lattannavar
---
protocol/wayland.xml |
Modify existing drm-backend to set_scaling_filter property that
client has requested compositor to do.
drm-backend calls drmset property api of libdrm to do so.
Signed-off-by: Sameer Lattannavar
---
libweston/backend-drm/drm-internal.h | 18
libweston/backend-drm/drm.c | 4
set_scaling_filter is a libweston API for setting scaling filter and
wayland protocol extension implementation for setting crtc property as
per client's request.
Signed-off-by: Sameer Lattannavar
---
include/libweston/libweston.h | 7 +++
libweston/compositor.c| 25 +
Background:
Blurry outputs during upscaling the video buffer, is a generic problem
of graphics industry. One of the major reason behind this blurriness is
the interpolation of pixel values used by most of the upscaling hardware.
Nearest-neighbor is a scaling filter type, which works by filling in
Modify existing sample weston client image application to add
a scaling_filter request through commandline parameter.
Signed-off-by: Sameer Lattannavar
---
clients/image.c | 49
clients/window.c | 7 +++
clients/window.h | 4
3 files c
Hi,
this is most likely mutter questing, but I'll try it anyway. Is it
possible to position popup above the desktop toolbar like XWayland or
X11 do? Screenshots worth thousands words:
Wayland popup: https://ibb.co/0jtsj51
vs.
XWayland popup: https://ibb.co/G0HTRVC
--
Jan Horak
Senior Software E
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 10:33:09 +
Alan Griffiths wrote:
> On 19/12/2019 10:28, Guillermo Rodriguez wrote:
> > Uhm. I am not sure I can switch to systemd at this point.
> > How does this (Weston being ready / not ready) look like from the client
> > side?
> >
> > i.e. if I want to make sure the
Hi Silvan,
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:56:12 +0100
"Silvan Jegen" wrote:
> Hi
>
> Simon Ser wrote:
> > Hi Dorota,
> >
> > On Sunday, December 15, 2019 7:55 PM, Dorota Czaplejewicz
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > in order to give this change more traction, I've been thinking about
> >
On Thursday 2019-12-19 11:13, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote:
>>
>> If you used systemd, Weston has integration for that, both startup
>> notification to ensure dependent services are started only after
>> Weston is ready and socket activation should you choose to want
>> that.
>
>Uhm. I am not
On 19/12/2019 10:28, Guillermo Rodriguez wrote:
> Uhm. I am not sure I can switch to systemd at this point.
> How does this (Weston being ready / not ready) look like from the client side?
>
> i.e. if I want to make sure the client is launched once Weston is ready,
> 1. Is there any way to manually
El jue., 19 dic. 2019 a las 9:15, Pekka Paalanen
() escribió:
>
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:10:14 +0100
> Guillermo Rodriguez wrote:
>
> > In my application I need to run several clients, and each one is started
> > from a separate SysV init script. I guess that I will need to define the
> > XDG_RUNT
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 13:10:14 +0100
Guillermo Rodriguez wrote:
> In my application I need to run several clients, and each one is started
> from a separate SysV init script. I guess that I will need to define the
> XDG_RUNTIME_DIR env var to point to this "made up" location in each
> script. A bit
13 matches
Mail list logo