RE: FW: xrandr and xwayland

2021-08-06 Thread David Deyo
Hey Daniel, It seems if my rotation is 0 or 180, touch works correctly. Maybe it’s related to whether my button array fits on the screen entirely. If it’s 90 or 270 (or if the image is partially off-screen), the touch coordinates are off. Does anyone have any idea where I should look to align

RE: FW: xrandr and xwayland

2021-08-06 Thread David Deyo
Thanks Daniel, My local test is just a timer that rotates every 5 seconds. I have a python keyboard running that rotates, but I have remnants of the original keyboard. Almost like I have a stale buffer. The extra keyboard images don’t respond either. Is there some clear I need to be calling b

RE: FW: xrandr and xwayland

2021-08-06 Thread David Deyo
Thanks Daniel, Excellent information. I had a thought on the patch, what if the iio part were something that ‘could be implemented’ by end developers (as the hardware dictated), but a way to rotate would exist. Maybe an ipc socket could be a generic means to implement a rotation. That way,

Re: FW: xrandr and xwayland

2021-08-06 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi Guillermo, On Fri, 6 Aug 2021 at 10:44, Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia wrote: > El vie, 6 ago 2021 a las 10:14, Daniel Stone () > escribió: >> kiosk-shell is something we have in newer versions of Weston which >> sounds like it would work well for your usecases - it's designed to >> just run a si

Re: FW: xrandr and xwayland

2021-08-06 Thread Guillermo Rodriguez Garcia
Hi Daniel, El vie, 6 ago 2021 a las 10:14, Daniel Stone () escribió: > kiosk-shell is something we have in newer versions of Weston which > sounds like it would work well for your usecases - it's designed to > just run a single application fullscreen. You might want to check out > what we have in

Re: FW: xrandr and xwayland

2021-08-06 Thread Daniel Stone
Hi David, On Thu, 5 Aug 2021 at 22:17, David Deyo wrote: > > Sounds like you're missing wl_display_flush() in your client code, so the > > requests don't make it to the socket buffer until they're forced to because > > it's filled up. > > That did it. You guys are awesome. I don’t suppose the