On Monday, July 17th, 2023 at 15:24, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> > > For going forward, here is one way we can shave this yak:
> > > - update libdrm to max 64 nodes
> > > - roll libdrm release, nag distributions to update to it // could be
> > > folded with the next release below
> > > - update lib
On Mon, 17 Jul 2023 at 10:45, Simon Ser wrote:
>
> On Monday, July 17th, 2023 at 09:30, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>
> > > I'm worried what might happen with old user-space, especially old libdrm.
> >
> > I also share the same concern. Although the bigger issue is not libdrm
> > - since we can update
On Monday, July 17th, 2023 at 09:30, Emil Velikov
wrote:
> > I'm worried what might happen with old user-space, especially old libdrm.
>
> I also share the same concern. Although the bigger issue is not libdrm
> - since we can update it and prod distributions to update it.
> The biggest concern
On Fri, 14 Jul 2023 at 11:32, Simon Ser wrote:
>
> (cc Daniel Vetter and Pekka because this change has uAPI repercussions)
>
> On Friday, June 30th, 2023 at 13:56, James Zhu wrote:
>
> > From: Christian König
> >
> > This makes room for up to 128 DRM devices.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christian Kön
