y the best point of contact
from now on.
I will still be reachable on mail (johanhels...@gmail.com) and freenode
(johanhelsing), and try to answer if there are questions about qtwayland, but
you will probably have to ping me specifically to get my attention.
Br,
Joh
Same for us in Qt. When we implement a new version of the protocol, we copy it
manually from wayland-protocols into qtwayland/src/3rdparty/protocol, that way
we can support new versions regardless of which old-as-dirt wayland-protocols
version is shipped with the device.
I think that if we'd ha
Hi,
Thanks for asking, a membership for Qt would would be much appreciated! I'm
probably the best point of contact.
I've read through the document (v5) and it makes sense to me.
Acked-by: Johan Helsing
Qt has interest in the project both as a compositor toolkit and as a client
to
Hi Simon,
Sorry for not participating more activively in the discussion. Your summary
makes sense to me.
> Some people (from KDE, GLFW if I recall correctly) said
> there's some overhead in loading cursors on the client-side (a few megabytes,
> I/O when loading images) and that could be saved.
H
Hi Simon,
Thanks for working on this! :)
Is the intention to implement the client side inside libwayland-cursor? No
changes needed for toolkits except calling some new API when initializing
libwayland-cursor?
I guess it's also possible to implement it on the toolkit level using the old
libwaylan