On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 12:17 PM Matt Hoosier wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anybody know whether there’s a dedicated mailing list suitable for
> asking questions about the hardware acceleration in the remote desktop
> use-case for those two?
>
> I did a quick look through both repos’ README and CONTRI
On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 5:27 AM Olivier Fourdan wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> In Fedora and Red Hat Enterprise Linux, we ship a small shell script called
> "xvfb-run" originating from Debian to launch an X11 client within Xvfb.
>
> With the future removal of Xorg and all related Xservers in RHEL [1], ex
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 6:32 AM Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2023 18:44:16 -0400
> Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > Hey everyone,
> >
> > There's something I've been ruminating on for a few years now: the
> > state of wayland-protocols.
> >
&g
Hey everyone,
There's something I've been ruminating on for a few years now: the
state of wayland-protocols.
I've noticed that over the course of the existence of
wayland-protocols, only three have made it into "stable":
presentation-time, viewporter, and xdg-shell.
But basically no useful Wayla
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 5:56 PM Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 10:00:33AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> […]
> > >From a purely downstream perspective, I'd like to have Fedora Linux
> > switch to Wayland by default for SDL-based applications
Hey all,
Is there a reason why the development of the surface-suspension
protocol[1] has completely stalled out? It's been in the 30 day
discussion period for a few months now and it's a pretty critical
protocol for games (it's the main blocker for SDL to switch to Wayland
by default[2]).
>From a
