Re: [PATCH wayland] protocol: Add deprecation note about wl_shell

Hi! On 4 December 2017 at 09:16, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 10:57:45 +0800 > Jonas Ådahl wrote: > >> Now that xdg_shell is stable and much better defined than wl_shell we >> can finally deprecate wl_shell and guide users towards xdg_shell

Re: array and enum attributes (Was: [PATCH] xdg-shell: add draw states for xdg_surface)

Hi! On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 10:52 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 21:39:20 +0200 > "Nils Chr. Brause" <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> HI, >> >> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala..

Re: array and enum attributes (Was: [PATCH] xdg-shell: add draw states for xdg_surface)

HI, On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 15:39:47 +0800 > Jonas Ådahl wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 10:24:19AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote: >> > On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 13:16:31 -0500 >> > Yong Bakos

Re: [PATCH wayland v3] protocol: add support for cross-interface enum attributes

Very nice to see that finally landing! :) Since this patch has been created by Auke Booij back in 2015 (thank you very much!), there have been some protocol additions in the DnD area, which also need proper enum attributes. From the wayland.xml of the C++ Bindings[1]: wayland.xml:543:

Re: [PATCH wayland 4/6] doc: Don't warn if something is undocumented

On 30 Dec 2015 01:24, "Jonas Ådahl" <jad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 05:31:33PM +0100, Nils Chr. Brause wrote: > > On 29 Dec 2015 3:20 pm, "Jonas Ådahl" <jad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On

Re: [PATCH wayland 4/6] doc: Don't warn if something is undocumented

On 29 Dec 2015 3:20 pm, "Jonas Ådahl" <jad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 01:56:14PM +0100, Nils Chr. Brause wrote: > > No. > > If we want Wayland to be successful and widely used it has to be well > > documented (which it still

Re: [PATCH wayland 4/6] doc: Don't warn if something is undocumented

No. If we want Wayland to be successful and widely used it has to be well documented (which it still is far from). Turning off warnings about undocumented fields doesn't exactly help the documentation effort but rather impedes it. On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 3:10 AM, Jonas Ådahl

Re: [PATCH wayland v3] protocol: add support for cross-interface enum attributes

Awesome! I hope that gets pushed soon. :) Reviewed-by: Nils Christopher Brause On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 1:39 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > The enum attribute, for which scanner support was introduced in > 1771299, can be used to link message arguments to

Re: [PATCH] cosmetic: Remove use of C++ style comments

Hi, On Thu, Dec 3, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Chris Michael wrote: > Signed-off-by: Chris Michael > --- > src/compositor-rdp.c | 2 +- > src/vaapi-recorder.c | 2 +- > tests/weston-test.c | 2 +- > xwayland/window-manager.c | 2 +- > 4

Re: [PATCH v2 wayland] protocol: add support for cross-interface enum attributes

On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Auke Booij wrote: > I'd be happy to rebase against that, but since that hasn't been merged > yet, I thought I'd take the current tree as a a basis. > > If you think having the interface:: prefix everywhere makes sense, I > can change that if you

Re: [RFC] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

Hi, On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:01 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 03:25:55PM +, Daniel Stone wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 25 November 2015 at 14:17, Auke Booij wrote: >> > On 25 November 2015 at 13:43, Daniel Stone

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

Hi, On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Auke Booij <a...@tulcod.com> wrote: > On 24 November 2015 at 12:41, Nils Chr. Brause <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Sun, 1

Re: Changing wl_output.transform type to unsigned?

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 22:17:38 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij <a...@tulcod.com> wrote: >>

Re: [PATCH] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > On 9 November 2015 at 18:17, Bill Spitzak wrote: >> Making the transform into a bitfield allows bitfield tests for useful facts: >> it can see if it is a mirror image by testing the flip bit, and check for

Re: [PATCH] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

Hi, On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 12:54:00 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala..

Re: [PATCH] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

Hi, On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Auke Booij <a...@tulcod.com> wrote: > On 9 November 2015 at 11:54, Nils Chr. Brause <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>

Re: [PATCH] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

Hi, On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 15:38:22 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala..

Re: [PATCH] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

Hi, On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 6 Nov 2015 16:05:10 +0100 > "Nils Chr. Brause" <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Auke Booij <a...@tulco

Re: [PATCH] Declare enumeration wl_output.transform as bitfield.

Hi, On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:48 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > On 6 November 2015 at 13:03, Nils Christopher Brause > wrote: >> The enumeration wl_output.transform is clearly a bitfield. >> The definition of a bitfield is that each bit has a distinct >>

Re: [PATCH wayland v3 2/4] protocol: specify enum and bitfield attributes

Hi, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > Signed-off-by: Auke Booij > --- > protocol/wayland.xml | 36 ++-- > 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/protocol/wayland.xml

Re: [PATCH wayland v3 4/4] doc: output enum and bitfield attributes in the documentation

Hi, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > Signed-off-by: Auke Booij > --- > doc/publican/protocol-to-docbook.xsl | 9 + > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/publican/protocol-to-docbook.xsl >

Re: [PATCH wayland v3 3/4] scanner: enforce correct argument type for enums

Hi, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > The scanner now checks whether arguments that have an associated > have the right type. > An argument with an enum attribute must be of type int or uint, > and if the with that name has the bitfield attribute > set to

Re: [PATCH wayland v3 1/4] doc: document the enum and bitfield attributes

Hi, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > Introduce the enum and bitfield attributes, which allow you to refer to the > enum > you are expecting in an argument, and specify which enums are to be thought of > as bitfields. > > Signed-off-by: Auke Booij

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enum and bitfield XML attributes

Hi, On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 10:18 PM, Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 5:22 AM, Nils Chr. Brause <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> >> >> - Support for cross-interface enum referencing (e.g. >> >>

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] doc: document the enum and bitfield attributes

Hi, On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Auke Booij wrote: > On 22 October 2015 at 02:46, Bill Spitzak wrote: >> Sorry if this is a duplicate, I am having trouble with gmail. >> >> On 10/20/2015 12:38 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] doc: document the enum and bitfield attributes

Okay. Reviewed-by <nilschrbra...@googlemail.com> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Auke Booij <a...@tulcod.com> wrote: > On 21 October 2015 at 13:13, Nils Chr. Brause <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Bryce Harri

Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] protocol: specify enum and bitfield attributes

Hi, You are missing bitfield="true" for wl_shell_surface::resize and wl_output::transform. Cheers, Nils On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Auke Booij wrote: > Signed-off-by: Auke Booij > --- > protocol/wayland.xml | 34 +- > 1

Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Enum and bitfield XML attributes

Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 10:30 AM, Auke Booij wrote: > On 19 October 2015 at 23:21, Auke Booij wrote: >> There has been plenty of discussion regarding the introduction of new XML >> attributes. This series of patches improves on my earlier attempt to find

Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] doc: document the enum and bitfield attributes

Hi, On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:38 AM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:01:14AM -0700, Bryce Harrington wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 11:21:23PM +0100, Auke Booij wrote: >> > Introduce the enum and bitfield attributes, which allow you to refer to >>

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:25 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:27:58 +0100 > Auke Booij <a...@tulcod.com> wrote: > >> On 13 October 2015 at 16:19, Solerman Kaplon <soler...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Em 1

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 10:41:22 +0200 > Erik De Rijcke wrote: > >> Adding enum members is backward compatible for Java. If you compile against >> an enum with 2 members, and later on a new

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Erik De Rijcke <derijcke.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 4:35 PM, Nils Chr. Brause <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Pekka Paalanen <ppaala.

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 10:13 PM, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote: > Hi, > > On 5 October 2015 at 21:31, Victor Berger <victor.ber...@m4x.org> wrote: >> Le 2015-10-05 21:53, Nils Chr. Brause a écrit : >>> Since a language binding should su

Re: [PATCH wayland v2] Remove protocol/wayland.dtd

Hi, Reviewed-by: Nils Christopher Brause I ran distcheck and it worked. :) Cheers, Nils On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 10:01 AM, Auke Booij wrote: > Yeah, that was a pretty embarrassing mistake by me, for such a simple > patch. Thanks to Bryce for

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

I see. You're right. :) On 5 Oct 2015 22:31, "Victor Berger" <victor.ber...@m4x.org> wrote: > > Le 2015-10-05 21:53, Nils Chr. Brause a écrit : >> >> Bill Spitzak wrote: >>> >>> Similarly it seems like an "open" indicator t

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, Auke Booij wrote: > I think that we have an agreement in principle, just not in terms (and > this also goes back to my comment to Victor Berger). What I meant to > express is that any bindings that violate this rule are on the risk of > the bindings writers, rather than the wayland and

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Erik De Rijcke wrote: > - Defining an uint (bitfield) or int (single enum) in the xml for an enum > argument is the wrong approach. It prescribes, not describes. In some > languages eg Java, there is no such thing as an uint. What is

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, Pekka Paalanen wrote: > Adding these attributes to XML must not change the signatures generated > by wayland-scanner. > > Why: these are also used in C++, which does not implicitly covert > between enums and other stuff, which would break the build. >

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Clarify the enum argument type

Hi, I would recommend to also include the name of the interface, where the enum is defined, in the enum attribute, e.g: Also, I think you forgot some enum attributes, e.g. wl_shm_pool:: create_buffer::format is the wl_shm::format enum, but I can't find it in your patch (I can't seem to find the

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays

Hi, On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 7:49 PM, Bryce Harrington wrote: > The topic of adding better enum/bitfield support to the protocol has > come up a few[0] times[1] in the past, and again more recently[2]. We > also have several proposed patches in patchwork, but I'm not sure

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Clarify the enum argument type

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:00 PM, Bill Spitzak <spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Nils Chr. Brause <nilschrbra...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would recommend to also include the name of the interface, where th

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays in the .xml file

Hi, On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Victor Berger wrote: > > What I meant here is that the format and contents of the XML files is > currently defined by the implementation of the C scanner, which is a less > than optimal situation to discuss evolutions of this

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays in the .xml file

> - as well, adding the specification of the type contained in an array to an > arg that didn't have it would be a breaking change, and as such needs > thought. > > > Victor > > Le 2015-09-18 20:55, Bill Spitzak a écrit : >> >> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Nils Chr.

Re: Enums, bitfields and wl_arrays in the .xml file

Hi, There are even earlier discussions about including 'bitfield' and 'enum' fields into the XML protocol file, e.g: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2014-September/017071.html But none of them led to any actual changes. I still would very much like to see the 'bitfield' and

Re: [PATCH V2] wayland.xml: add enum, bitfield and is_bitfield attributes

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 13:59:39 +0800 Boyan Ding stu_...@126.com wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:27 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: I'm a little unsure. I think trying to completely solve this problem in a way that will

Re: [PATCH V2] wayland.xml: add enum, bitfield and is_bitfield attributes

On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:44:04 +0200 Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com wrote: This replaces [PATCH wayland] Add enum attribute to arg elements. Previous concers have be incorporated and it is meant for 1.7

Re: [PATCH wayland] Add enum attribute to arg elements

Another possibility would of course be to add an 'is_bitfield=true' attribute to enum elements that are actually bit fields instead of using 'bitfield' elements. Every sanely written scanner should be able to cope with that, shouldn't it? On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:09 PM, Nils Chr. Brause

Re: [PATCH wayland] Add enum attribute to arg elements

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, 1 Sep 2014 22:07:44 +0200 Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com wrote: While I'm at that, I would also like to make use of the enum names in the generated C code. As far as I can see, this would not break

[PATCH V2] wayland.xml: add enum, bitfield and is_bitfield attributes

This replaces [PATCH wayland] Add enum attribute to arg elements. Previous concers have be incorporated and it is meant for 1.7. From 733fb18b163de93276f092a4be100c7e0c0c723f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@googlemail.com Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 19:18:28 +0200 Subject

Re: [PATCH wayland] Add enum attribute to arg elements

On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:45 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, 30 Aug 2014 17:20:45 +0200 Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com wrote: There are programming languages, that are more strongly typed than C. People creating Wayland bindings for these languages probably

[PATCH V2] Wayland: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero

Hi! Because the other thread got so long, I repost the improved version of the patch for easier review: From 50cdeaf09a9bd90b1957a831217319e863c4c484 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@googlemail.com Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 09:46:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] wayland

[PATCH wayland] Add enum attribute to arg elements

the enumeration is declared and $enum is the name of the enumeration, which is used in this argument. This might also be of documentary value. Signed-off-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@googlemail.com --- protocol/wayland.dtd | 1 + protocol/wayland.xml | 32 2

Re: [PATCH weston] simple-shm: remove an unnecessary call of wl_display_get_fd()

Since wl_display_get_fd() doesn't have any side effects, this is truly useless. Reviewed-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Ryo Munakata ryomnk...@gmail.com wrote: --- clients/simple-shm.c | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [PATCH] xwayland: Use frame geometry for resizing shell surface

I also noticed this in current master. This seems to fix the problem. :) Reviewed-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 2:51 AM, Ondřej Majerech majerec...@gmail.com wrote: We want to set the size of the entire window, not just the input area. This fixes

Re: [PATCH] desktop-shell: Replace magic constants with named ones

This looks much more readable to me. Unnamed magic numbers are always confusing. Reviewed-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Ondřej Majerech majerec...@gmail.com wrote: Signed-off-by: Ondřej Majerech majerec...@gmail.com --- desktop-shell/shell.c

Re: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:27:02AM +0200, Marek Chalupa wrote: On 11 August 2014 18:02, Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 08:36:51AM +0200, Marek Chalupa wrote: proxy-flags = 0; After memset, this line can be removed as well

Re: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 7:36 PM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote: Which brings us back to my earlier question, now rephrased differently: are you going to forbid using the same Wayland connection with a 3rd party library? If yes, you're all good. ;-) Yes. :) One of the goals of

Re: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

; The same. Yes, of course. I guess we can also remove similar lines from wl_display_connect_to_fd then? New patch including this: From ec5eff0720efd90e868711a9b58bf1a435d156ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@googlemail.com Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:06:16 +0200 Subject

Re: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Pekka Paalanen ppaala...@gmail.com wrote No, I do not think that is wrong, but are you not writing language bindings or a wrapper library, which means you do not know how your code will be used? Yes, I'm writing C++ Bindings. These bindings don't expose the

Re: [PATCH v3 weston] gears: fix invalid calculation of the first FPS

; printf(Warning: FPS count is limited by the wayland compositor or monitor refresh rate\n); glEnable(GL_NORMALIZE); Perfect! :) Reviewed-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com -- 2.0.4 ___ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel

Re: [PATCH weston] simple-egl: Clean up unused frame_listener

pointer_handle_enter(void *data, struct wl_pointer *pointer, uint32_t serial, struct wl_surface *surface, This is indeed unused and may be confusing for beginners. Looks good to me. :) Reviewed-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com -- 2.0.2

Re: [Interest] qt5 window setGeometry and move not work in wayland platform

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Giulio Camuffo giuliocamu...@gmail.com wrote: The problem is that windows don't always have a meaningful position. If a window is shown on two outputs at the same time, maybe one of which a remote one, what is the window position? And what is the position of

Re: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

685959fb80e6a1b10b2230efb331996bc38838ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@googlemail.com Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2014 18:06:16 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero. Up until now, newly created wl_proxys (with proxy_create

Re: [PATCH v2 weston] gears: fix invalid calculation of the first FPS

, it is well readable and I don't see any other way to properly fix this. Therefore: Reviewed-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@gmail.com :) -- 2.0.4 ___ wayland-devel mailing list wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org

[PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

-by: Nils Chr. Brause nilschrbra...@googlemail.com --- src/wayland-client.c | 4 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/wayland-client.c b/src/wayland-client.c index 3e401d3..8006581 100644 --- a/src/wayland-client.c +++ b/src/wayland-client.c @@ -274,6 +274,8 @@ proxy_create(struct

Re: [PATCH] wayland-client: Initialize newly created wl_proxys to zero.

On 08/08/2014 07:23 PM, Marek Chalupa wrote: Just out of curiosity, did you have some troubles because of non-setting the proxy to zeroes? I wanted to check if I already assigned my meta data to the proxy be testing user_data against NULL. I have a workaround for this now, but I don't want