Hi,
On 11 September 2013 17:15, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:54:47PM -0400, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> Yeah, this is good to me. Media pipelines also really want release
>> events ASAP, so they can reuse hardware-decoder buffers.
>
> The problem is that this will introduce a
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:54:47PM -0400, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 11 September 2013 14:31, Neil Roberts wrote:
> > This reverts commit eccef6aadd142103ed151883e61c0e7a2fd98639.
> >
> > Queuing the buffer release event instead of posting it immediately
> > causes problems if the client is
Hi,
On 11 September 2013 14:31, Neil Roberts wrote:
> This reverts commit eccef6aadd142103ed151883e61c0e7a2fd98639.
>
> Queuing the buffer release event instead of posting it immediately
> causes problems if the client is not installing a frame callback and
> instead is waiting for the buffer rel
This reverts commit eccef6aadd142103ed151883e61c0e7a2fd98639.
Queuing the buffer release event instead of posting it immediately
causes problems if the client is not installing a frame callback and
instead is waiting for the buffer release events to throttle its
rendering. This will happen in Mesa