On Wed, 27 Aug 2014 13:43:13 +0200
Sjoerd Simons sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, 2014-08-03 at 10:39 +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
As for wl_surface re-use after destroying a role, I have found that
resetting a role to allow re-use is much easier and cleaner than
not to, in
On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:23:23 -0700
Jason Ekstrand ja...@jlekstrand.net wrote:
I think the way it's handled in subsurfaces allows you to create a
subsurface from a surface, delete the surface, and then re-use the surface
as something else. If I recall correctly, weston allows a fair amount of
Remove the explicit destroy method from xdg_surface and xdg_popup as
neither of them can be re-created after being destroyed. As a results a
wl_surface gets into an odd sort of odd limbo state after a
xdg_{surface,popup}.destroy call where it not only no longer has an
xdg_{surface,popup}
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Sjoerd Simons
sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Remove the explicit destroy method from xdg_surface and xdg_popup as
neither of them can be re-created after being destroyed. As a results a
wl_surface gets into an odd sort of odd limbo state after a
On Mon, 2014-07-21 at 10:03 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Sjoerd Simons
sjoerd.sim...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Remove the explicit destroy method from xdg_surface and xdg_popup as
neither of them can be re-created after being destroyed. As a results a
Note that I fixed GTK+ to always create a new wl_surface and never reuse
it. I don't think it makes any sense to keep the wl_surface around in the
background. I certainly don't think it ever makes sense to destroy the
xdg_surface and then make it into an xdg_popup or similar.
The semantics of
I think the way it's handled in subsurfaces allows you to create a
subsurface from a surface, delete the surface, and then re-use the surface
as something else. If I recall correctly, weston allows a fair amount of
surface re-use right now.
That said, I'm not opposed to not allowing it for xdg
