On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 09:49:36AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:10:07 -0700
> Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:56:10AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:55:12 -0700
> > > Bryce Harrington wrote:
> > >
> > > > MIT has relea
On Thu, 11 Jun 2015 18:10:07 -0700
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:56:10AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:55:12 -0700
> > Bryce Harrington wrote:
> >
> > > MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
> > > including the old
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:56:10AM +0300, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:55:12 -0700
> Bryce Harrington wrote:
>
> > MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
> > including the old 'X11 License' or 'MIT License'. Some code under this
> > license was in
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:58 AM, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Bryce,
>
> On 10 June 2015 at 19:55, Bryce Harrington wrote:
>> MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
>> including the old 'X11 License' or 'MIT License'. Some code under this
>> license was in fact included
Hi Bryce,
On 10 June 2015 at 19:55, Bryce Harrington wrote:
> MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
> including the old 'X11 License' or 'MIT License'. Some code under this
> license was in fact included in X.org's Xserver in the past. However,
> X.org now prefers
On Wed, 10 Jun 2015 11:55:12 -0700
Bryce Harrington wrote:
> MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
> including the old 'X11 License' or 'MIT License'. Some code under this
> license was in fact included in X.org's Xserver in the past. However,
> X.org now prefers
MIT has released software under several slightly different licenses,
including the old 'X11 License' or 'MIT License'. Some code under this
license was in fact included in X.org's Xserver in the past. However,
X.org now prefers the MIT Expat License as the standard (which,
confusingly, is also re