Having done this before (but about 18 years ago) I *REALLY* doubt this
solution is better. However it is possible that font design has changed
a good deal since then?
Using the width of a '2' made attempts by software to print columns look
*vastly* better. It was unreadable before this because
Actually I used the technique from vte terminal widget.
See: https://git.gnome.org/browse/vte/tree/src/vtedraw.h#n34
The average width is used for the ascii glyphs.
Use "2" or "n" glyph is good for some font, but maybe not for the other
fonts.
Use the average width is good for most fonts, includi
This average will result in a value that does not match any of the
characters. Using the width of '2' probably works better. This means
that at least digits will line up (it is very common for all digits
except perhaps '1' to have the same width). In theory you can use 'n'
but I have gotten bet
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 03:32:41PM +0800, Peng Wu wrote:
> ---
> clients/terminal.c | 55
> --
> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
Thanks, that makes sense, committed. Sorry for the delay.
Kristian
> diff --git a/clients/term
---
clients/terminal.c | 55 --
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/clients/terminal.c b/clients/terminal.c
index 2985726..0d4f726 100644
--- a/clients/terminal.c
+++ b/clients/terminal.c
@@ -54,6 +54,16 @@ terminal_de
