On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 23:10:14 -0400
nerdopolis wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 9:17:37 AM EDT you wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:17:18 -0400
> > nerdopolis wrote:
> >
> > > ---
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > the commit message should contain at least briefly why we want this. I
> > have a
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 9:17:37 AM EDT you wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:17:18 -0400
> nerdopolis wrote:
>
> > ---
>
> Hi,
>
> the commit message should contain at least briefly why we want this. I
> have a feeling this is the right thing to do, but I can't quite put the
> reason into
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 08:17:18 -0400
nerdopolis wrote:
> ---
Hi,
the commit message should contain at least briefly why we want this. I
have a feeling this is the right thing to do, but I can't quite put the
reason into words myself.
We would also prefer a Signed-off-by line in all patches, with
---
compositor/main.c| 2 +-
libweston/compositor-drm.c | 5 +
libweston/compositor-fbdev.c | 5 +
man/weston-drm.man | 7 +--
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compositor/main.c b/compositor/main.c
index 0615d87e..61bda282 100644
-
---
compositor/main.c| 2 +-
libweston/compositor-drm.c | 5 +
libweston/compositor-fbdev.c | 5 +
man/weston-drm.man | 7 +--
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/compositor/main.c b/compositor/main.c
index 0615d87e..61bda282 100644
-
