Hi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Eoff, Ullysses A
ullysses.a.e...@intel.com wrote:
It was pointed out to me that I used C++ style comments... whoops, old habits.
Before I resubmit does anyone else see any other coding convention issues
that I missed or deviated from? Kristian?
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:13:45 -0700
U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com wrote:
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Test surface pointer enter/leave/motion and surface leave/enter
events more aggressively.
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Hi Artie,
-Original Message-
From: David Herrmann [mailto:dh.herrm...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:31 PM
To: Eoff, Ullysses A
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] event-test: more aggressive event testing
Hi
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Eoff
-Original Message-
From: Pekka Paalanen [mailto:ppaala...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2012 11:31 PM
To: Eoff, Ullysses A
Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] event-test: more aggressive event testing
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:13:45 -0700
U. Artie Eoff
-
From: Eoff, Ullysses A
Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2012 2:14 PM
To: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Eoff, Ullysses A
Subject: [PATCH v2] event-test: more aggressive event testing
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Test surface pointer enter/leave/motion and surface leave
From: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
Test surface pointer enter/leave/motion and surface leave/enter
events more aggressively.
Signed-off-by: U. Artie Eoff ullysses.a.e...@intel.com
---
tests/event-test.c | 269
tests/test-client.c
