On Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 2:00 PM, Peter Hutterer
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:58:20AM -0800, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> > What is the plan for using a tablet in "relative" mode? This is pretty
> > common if the tablet is smaller than the screen, as many modern ones are.
I should point out that a big surprise for me was discovering that
acceleration was applied to the relative motion of the tool. I
discovered that while trying to draw rectangles to determine the scale
and realized that only if I moved really slowly would I get the same
size every time.
I had
What is the plan for using a tablet in "relative" mode? This is pretty
common if the tablet is smaller than the screen, as many modern ones are.
My guess is that you plan to deliver screen/surface coordinates, and that
the client is unaware of the actual size of the tablet. However it is not
clear
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 11:58:20AM -0800, Bill Spitzak wrote:
> What is the plan for using a tablet in "relative" mode? This is pretty
> common if the tablet is smaller than the screen, as many modern ones are.
I would love to hear where you get this information from, because the one
thing we're
fixing up the weston patches for this showed a couple of typos:
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 12:50:01PM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> +
the protocol name should just be "tablet", i.e. tablet_unstable_v1 in this case.
> +
this should be ...seat_v1
> +
this should be v1
These are all fixed