On Wed, 2 Mar 2016 11:01:12 -0800
Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 4:25 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> >
> > > bar_obj = wl_bar_new();
> > > wl_proxy_set_queue((wl_proxy *)bar_obj, queue);
> > > wl_bar_add_listener(bar_obj, ...);
> > > /*
On Tue, 1 Mar 2016 11:41:21 -0800
Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 4:12 AM, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:26:53 -0800
> > Bill Spitzak wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Jonas Ådahl
On Tue, 16 Feb 2016 14:26:53 -0800
Bill Spitzak wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
>
> The proxy wrapper approach can be tested out by appling this patch:
> >
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 7:48 PM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
The proxy wrapper approach can be tested out by appling this patch:
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/wayland-devel/2015-June/023054.html
Paraphrased here:
> In short, instead of
>
> bar =
mre (ADITG/SW1)
> > Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH wayland] client: ensure thread safety for
> > wl_display_roundtrip_queue()
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:19:43PM +, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1) wrote:
> > > We have to
6937
> -Original Message-
> From: wayland-devel [mailto:wayland-devel-
> boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of Jonas Ådahl
> Sent: Dienstag, 16. Februar 2016 04:49
> To: Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1)
> Cc: wayland-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH wa
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 02:19:43PM +, Ucan, Emre (ADITG/SW1) wrote:
> We have to block other threads from reading events. Otherwise other threads
> may assign done event to the default queue, if they call
> wl_display_read_events before setting the queue for the callback proxy.
> This would
We have to block other threads from reading events. Otherwise other threads
may assign done event to the default queue, if they call
wl_display_read_events before setting the queue for the callback proxy.
This would cause a deadlock in wl_display_dispatch_queue,
because the default queue is not