On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 11:30:25AM +0200, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:26:58 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 22 November 2013 15:30, wrote:
> > > The symbol is needed only for the EGL buffer path. If --disable-egl is
> > > given to ./configure, there is no ne
On 23 November 2013 10:30, Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:26:58 +
> Daniel Stone wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 22 November 2013 15:30, wrote:
>> > The symbol is needed only for the EGL buffer path. If --disable-egl is
>> > given to ./configure, there is no need for it, so fix it
On Fri, 22 Nov 2013 17:26:58 +
Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22 November 2013 15:30, wrote:
> > The symbol is needed only for the EGL buffer path. If --disable-egl is
> > given to ./configure, there is no need for it, so fix it to actually not
> > look for that symbol needlessly.
> >
>
Hi,
On 22 November 2013 15:30, wrote:
> The symbol is needed only for the EGL buffer path. If --disable-egl is
> given to ./configure, there is no need for it, so fix it to actually not
> look for that symbol needlessly.
>
> This should fix the runtime error:
>
> Failed to load module: .
From: Pekka Paalanen
The symbol is needed only for the EGL buffer path. If --disable-egl is
given to ./configure, there is no need for it, so fix it to actually not
look for that symbol needlessly.
This should fix the runtime error:
Failed to load module: .../rpi-backend.so: undefined s